A Comparison Study of Inspector's Performance between Regular and Complex Tasks
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
A Comparison Study of Inspector's Performance between Regular and Complex Tasks

Authors: Santirat Nansaarng, Sittichai Kaewkuekool, Supreeya Siripattanakunkajorn

Abstract:

This research was to study a comparison of inspector-s performance between regular and complex visual inspection task. Visual task was simulated on DVD read control circuit. Inspection task was performed by using computer. Subjects were 10 undergraduate randomly selected and test for 20/20. Then, subjects were divided into two groups, five for regular inspection (control group) and five for complex inspection (treatment group) tasks. Result was showed that performance on regular and complex inspectors was significantly difference at the level of 0.05. Inspector performance on regular inspection was showed high percentage on defects detected by using equal time to complex inspection. This would be indicated that inspector performance was affected by visual inspection task.

Keywords: Visual inspection task, regular and complex task.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1329424

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1210

References:


[1] Kartik Madhani, Mohammad T. Khaswneh, Sittichai Kaewkuekool, Anand K. Gramopadhye, and Brain J. Melloy, 2002. Measurement of human trust in a hybrid inspection for varying error patterns. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 46th annual meeting, PP.418-422.
[2] Harris, D. H., and Chaney, F.B., 1969. Human Factor in Quality Assurance, Wiley, New York.
[3] Keawkuekool, Sittichai, 2003. Using alternative feedback strategies to improve aircraft inspection performance. Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 237
[4] Parkes, K. R., and Rennocks, J., 1971. The effect of briefing on target acquisition performance. Technical Report 260. Loughborough, University of Technology, Loughborough, UK.
[5] Gordon, S. E., 1994. Systematic Training Program Design: Maximizing Effectiveness and Minimizing Liability. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.