Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) Dynamics Modeling and Performance Evaluation
A sophisticated simulator provides a cost-effective measure to carry out preliminary mission testing and diagnostic while reducing potential failures for real life at sea trials. The presented simulation framework covers three key areas: AUV modeling, sensor modeling, and environment modeling. AUV modeling mainly covers the area of AUV dynamics. Sensor modeling deals with physics and mathematical models that govern each sensor installed onto the AUV. Environment model incorporates the hydrostatic, hydrodynamics, and ocean currents that will affect the AUV in a real-time mission. Based on this designed simulation framework, custom scenarios provided by the user can be modeled and its corresponding behaviors can be observed. This paper focuses on the accuracy of the simulated data from AUV model and environmental model derived from a developed AUV test-bed which was jointly upgraded by DSTO and the University of Adelaide. The main contribution of this paper is to experimentally verify the accuracy of the proposed simulation framework.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1073048Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 4111
 B. Allen, R. Stokey, T. Austin, N. Forrester, R. Goldsborough, M. Purcell, C. von Alt, “REMUS: A small low cost AUV; System description, field trials, performance results,” Proceedings of IEEE Ocean 97, pp. 994-1000, 1997.
 C. Payne, Principles of Naval Weapon Systems, 2006, Naval Institute Press, USA.
 C. Silvestre, A. Pascoal, and A.J. Healey, “AUV control under wave disturbances: An application of mixed design methods,” Proceedings of CONTROLO ’98 (3rd Portugese Conference on Automatic Control), Coimbra, Portugal, September 1998, pp 423-429.
 D.A. Smallwood, and L.L. Whitcomb, “Adaptive Identification of dynamically positioned underwater robotic vehicles,”IEEE Trans.Control Systems Technology, vol/ 11. no. 4, pp. 505-515, July 2003.
 D.P. Brutzman, Y. Kanayama, M.J. Zyda, “Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology,”Proceedings of the 92’ Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, pp. 3-10, 1992.
 D.P. Brutzman, M.R. Macedonia, and M.J. Zyda, “Internetwork Infrastructure Requirements for Virtual Environments,” Proceedings of the VRML’95 Symposium, pp. 95-104, 1995.
 E. Omerdic, “Thruster fault accomodation for underwater vehicles,” First IFAC workshop on guidance and control of underwater vehicles GCUV’ 03, Newport, South Wales, UK., April 2003 ,pp. 221–226.
 G. Conte, S. M. Zanoli, D. Scaradozzi, and A. Conti, “Evaluation of hydrodynamics parameters of a UUV. A preliminary study,” 1st International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, pp. 545–548, 2004.
 G. Sten, P. E. Hagen, N. Størkersen, K. Vestgård and P. Kartvedt, “AUV based mine hunting demonstrated from MCMV,” UDT Europe 2002, La Spezia, Italy, June 2002.
 H. Singh, “An entropic framework for AUV sensor modelling
[Ph.D. Thesis],” 1995, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 133 p.
 J.B. Lundberg, "Alternative algorithms for the GPS static positioning solution". Applied Mathematics and Computation (Elsevier), 2001, vol. 119 (1): pp21-34.
 J.J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 3rd ed., New Jersey, 2005.
 J.N. Newman, Marine Hydrodynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.
 J.S. Riedel, “Seaway learning and motion compensation in shallow waters for small AUVs”, 1999, PhD Thesis, NPS.
 J. Yuh, “Modelling and control of underwater robotics vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man., Cybern., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1475-1483, 1990.
 K.M.Tan, T. Liddy, A. Anvar, and L. Tien-Fu, “The advancement of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) Technology,” Proceedings of Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2008, Singapore, pp336-341.
 K.M.Tan, A. Anvar, and L. Tien-Fu, “6 Degrees of Freedom (DOF) Maritime Robotic Simulation Framework,” 11th International Conference on Control, Automation, Roboitics and Vision,Singapore, December 2010.
 K.R. Goheen, “The modeling and control of remotely operated underwater vehicles,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, 1986.
 K. Goheen, and E. Jeffreys, “The application alternative modeling techniques to ROV dynamics,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1302-1309, 1990.
 K. Narendra, and A. Annaswamy. Stable Adaptive Systems. Prentice- Hall, NY, 1988
 L.E. Kinsler, A.R. Frey, A.B. Coppens, and J.V. Sanders, Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed., Wiley, 2000, New York, pp448-450.
 L. Molnar, “A hybrid control architecture development for the guidance, navigation and control of the tethra prototype submersible vehicle,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limerick, 2006.
 M.A. Ainslie, J.G. McColm, "A simplified formula for viscous and chemical absorption in sea water", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998, vol.103 (3), 1671-1672.
 M. Caccia, G. Indiveri, and G. Veruggio, “Modeling and Identification of Open-Frame Variable Configuration Unmanned Underwater Vehicles ,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 227-240, April 2000
 P. Fofonoff, R. Millard, “Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater”, 1983, UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 44, UNESCO.
 R.J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1983.
 S. Eiani-Cherif, G. Lebret, and M. Perrier, “Identification and control of a submarine vehicle,” Proceedings of the 5th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control, pp.327-332, Nantes, France, 1997.
 S. Feijun, P.E. An, A. Folleco, “Modeling and simulation of autonomous underwater vehicles: design and implementation,” IEEE Jounal of Oceanic Eng., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 283-296, April 2003.
 S. Sastry, and M. Bodson, Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence, and Robustness. Prentice-Hall, 1989.
 Y.H. Eng, W.S. Lau, E. Low, G. Seet, and C.S. Chin, “Estimation of Hydrodynamics Coefficients of an ROV using Free Decay Pendulum Motion,”Engineering Letters, 2009.