Comparative Analysis of Mobility Support in Mobile IP and SIP
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Comparative Analysis of Mobility Support in Mobile IP and SIP

Authors: Hasanul Ferdaus, Sazzadur Rahman, Kamrul Islam

Abstract:

With the rapid usage of portable devices mobility in IP networks becomes more important issue in the recent years. IETF standardized Mobile IP that works in Network Layer, which involves tunneling of IP packets from HA to Foreign Agent. Mobile IP suffers many problems of Triangular Routing, conflict with private addressing scheme, increase in load in HA, need of permanent home IP address, tunneling itself, and so on. In this paper, we proposed mobility management in Application Layer protocol SIP and show some comparative analysis between Mobile IP and SIP in context of mobility.

Keywords: Mobility, mobile IP, SIP, tunneling.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334720

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1854

References:


[1] C. Perkins, "IP mobility support," IETF RFC 2002, 1996.
[2] C. Perkins and D. Johnson, "Route optimization in mobile IP," Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb. 1999. Work in progress.
[3] H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson, "RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications," Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 1889, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1996.
[4] M. Handley, H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler, and J. Rosenberg, "SIP: session initiation protocol," Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 3261, Internet Engineering Task Force, June, 2002.
[5] IP encapsulation within IP, C. Perkins, RFC 2003, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2003.txt, October 1996.
[6] Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), D. Farinacci et al., RFC 2784, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2784.txt, March 2000.
[7] Ferguson, P. & Senie, D., 2000, ÔÇÿNetwork Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing-, IETF RFC 2827.
[8] C. Perkins and Kuang-Yeh Wang, "Optimized Smooth Handoffs in Mobile IP," Int-l. Symp. Comp. Commun, 1999.
[9] H. Schulzrinne and J. Rosenberg, "The session initiation protocol: Providing advanced telephony services across the internet," Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 3, pp. 144-160, October-December 1998.
[10] M. Handley and V. Jacobson, "SDP: session description protocol," Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2327, Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 1998.
[11] S. Donovan and J. Rosenberg, "SIP session timer," Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, July 2000.Work in progress.
[12] J.-O. Vatn and G. Q. M. Jr., "The effect of using co-located care-of addresses onmacro handover latency," in Proc. of 14th Nordic Teletraffic Seminar, (Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark), Aug. 1998.
[13] Henning Schulzrinne & Elin Wedlund, "Application-Layer Mobility Using SIP".