Importance of the Green Belts to Reduce Noise Pollution and Determination of Roadside Noise Reduction Effectiveness of Bushes in Konya, Turkey
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Importance of the Green Belts to Reduce Noise Pollution and Determination of Roadside Noise Reduction Effectiveness of Bushes in Konya, Turkey

Authors: S. Onder, Z. Kocbeker

Abstract:

The impact of noise upon live quality has become an important aspect to make both urban and environmental policythroughout Europe and in Turkey. Concern over the quality of urban environments, including noise levels and declining quality of green space, is over the past decade with increasing emphasis on designing livable and sustainable communities. According to the World Health Organization, noise pollution is the third most hazardous environmental type of pollution which proceeded by only air (gas emission) and water pollution. The research carried out in two phases, the first stage of the research noise and plant types providing the suction of noise was evaluated through literature study and at the second stage, definite types (Juniperus horizontalis L., Spirea vanhouetti Briot., Cotoneaster dammerii C.K., Berberis thunbergii D.C., Pyracantha coccinea M. etc.) were selected for the city of Konya. Trials were conducted on the highway of Konya. The biggest value of noise reduction was 6.3 dB(A), 4.9 dB(A), 6.2 dB(A) value with compared to the control which includes the group that formed by the bushes at the distance of 7m, 11m, 20m from the source and 5m, 9m, 20m of plant width, respectively. In this paper, definitions regarding to noise and its sources were made and the precautions were taken against to noise that mentioned earlier with the adverse effects of noise. Plantation design approaches and suggestions concerning to the diversity to be used, which are peculiar to roadside, were developed to discuss the role and the function of plant material to reduce the noise of the traffic.

Keywords: Bushes, noise, road, Konya

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1071085

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 5764

References:


[1] Cohen, B., 2006. Urbanization in developing countries: current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technol Soc 2006;28:63-80.
[2] McMichael AJ., 2000. The urban environment and health in a world of increasing globalization: issues for developing countries. BullWorld Health Organ 2000;78(9):1117-26.
[3] Moudon, AV. and Wee BV., 2009. Environmental effects of urban traffic. In: Garling T, Steg L, editors. Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: problems, causes, and solutions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007. p. 11-32.
[4] Sy, HK., Ong, PP., Tang, SH. and Tan, KL., 1985. Traffic noise survey and analysis in Singapore. Applied Acustics, 18(2), 15-125.
[5] Garcia, A., 1997. Noise survey in the community of Valencia (Spain). Acustica, 839(3), 516-521.
[6] Arana, M. and Garcia, A., 1998. A social survey on the effects on environmental noise pollution in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Applied Acoustics, 53, 245-253.
[7] Onuu, MU. 2000. Road traffic noise in Nigeria.Measurements, analysis and evaluation of nuisance. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 233(4), 391-405.
[8] Zannin, PH., Zanin, FB. and Barbosa, W. A., 2002. Environmental noise pollution in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Applied Acoustic, 63, 351-358.
[9] Li, B., Tao, S. and Dawson, R.W., 2002. Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise from the main urban roads in Beijing. Applied Acoustics, 63(10), 1137-1142, October.
[10] Morillas, JMB., Escobar, VG., Sierra, JAM., Gómez, RV. and Carmona, JT., 2002. An environmental noise study in the city of Cáceres, Spain. Applied Acoustics, 63 (10), 1061-1070, October.
[11] Gunnarsson AG, Ohrstrom E., 2007. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 83:115-126.
[12] Mishra RK, Parida M. and Rangnekar─▒nt S., 2010. Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise along bus rapid transit system corridor. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (4):737-750.
[13] Aylor DE, 1972. Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 197-205.
[14] Whitcomb, C. and Stowers, J., 1974. Stop noise with hedges. Horticulture, 2(4), 58-67.
[15] Lorenz, E., 1975. Karayolları Ağaçlandırma Rehberi (Çeviren F. Tanrıverdi) Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü Matbaası. Yayın, 214, 55, Ankara.
[16] Cook, DI. and Haverbeke, DF., 1977. Suburbon noise control with planting and solid barrier combinations Research bulletin p. 100. Lincoln: EM.
[17] Krag, J., 1979. Pilot study on railway noise attenuation by belts of trees. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 66(3), 407-415.
[18] Çepel, N., 1994. Landscape Ecology- I.U. Forest Faculty, Puplished No. 429, 228, İstanbul.
[19] Pal A., Kumar V. And Saxena N., 2000. Noise attenuation by greenbelts, Journal of Soundand Vibration 234 (2000)149-165.
[20] Rao, PS., Gavane, AG., Ankam, SS., Ansari, MF., Pandit, IV., and Nema, P., 2004. Performance evaluation of a green belt in a petroleum refinery: A case study. Ecological Engineering, 23(2), 77-84.
[21] Fang CF. and Ling DL, 2003. Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning 63:187-195.
[22] Fang, CF. and Ling, DL., 2005. Guidance for noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71 (1), 29-34.
[23] Tyagi V., Kumar K. and Jain V., 2006. A study of the spectral characteristics of traffic noise attenuation by vegetation belts in Delhi, Applied Acoustics 67 (2006) 926-935.
[24] Pathak V., Tripathi B., Mishra V., 2008. Dynamicsof traffic noise in a tropical city Varanasi and its abatement through vegetation, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 146 (2008) 67-75.
[25] Koçbeker Z. and Onder S. 2012. Investigation of the Noise Reduction Provided by Bush Belts in Konya, Turkey. J. Int. Environmental Application & Sciences, Vol. 7(1):48-54.
[26] Anonymous 1999. The Turkish environmental legislation. the publication of Environment Foundation of Turkey. Publication no:134. Onder printing, Ankara.
[27] Anonymous 2012. World Health Organization, Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise. Available at:http://docs.wind-watch.org/WHOburden- of-disease-from-environmental-noise-2011.pdf 2011. Accessed Feb. 10, 2012.
[28] Sar─▒g├╝l, S., 1995. CED Kapsam─▒nda Ses ve G├╝r├╝lt├╝ Kirlenmesi. D.E.├£. ├çevre Ara┼ƒt─▒rma ve Uygulama Merkezi ve TMMOB ├çevre M├╝hendisleri Odas─▒ ─░zmir ┼×ubesi. ─░zmir.
[29] Gür, K. and Onder, S. 2000. Konya'da Gürültü Kirliliği ve Alınması Gereken Biyolojik Önlemler. 3. GAP Mühendislik Kongresi. 24-26 Mayıs 2000 s: 286-294. Urfa
[30] Erdo─ƒan E. and Yazgan M., 2009. Landscaping in reducing traffic noise problem in cities: Ankara case. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 4 (10): 1015-1022.
[31] Nagendra, H. and Rocchini, D., 2008. High resolution satellite imagery for tropical biodiversity assessment: the devil is in the detail. Biodiversity and Conserva- tion 17, 3431-3442.
[32] Heynen, N., Perkins, HA. and Roy, P., 2006. The impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review 42, 3-25.
[33] Fernandez-Juricic, E., 2000. Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology 14, 513-521.
[34] Chow, WTL. and Roth, M., 2006. Temporal dynamics of the urban heat island of Singapore. International Journal of Climatology 26, 2243- 2260.
[35] McPherson, EG., Nowak, D., Heisler, G., Grimmond, S., Souch, C., Grant, R. and Rowntree, R., 1997. Quantifying urban forest structure, function and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1, 49-61.
[36] Maco, SE. And McPherson, EG., 2003. A practical approach to assessing structure, function and value of street tree populations in small communities. Journal of Arboriculture 29, 84-97.
[37] Beckett, KP., Freer-Smith, P. and Taylor, G., 2000. Effective tree species for local air- quality management. Journal of Arboriculture 26, 12-19.
[38] Kragh J., 1981. Road traffic noise attenuation by belts of trees. J. Sound Vib.74(2):235-241.
[39] Reethof, G., 1973. Effect of plantings on radiation of highway noise. Air Pollut. Control Aso. 23 (3), 185-189.
[40] Cook, DI. and Haverbeke, DF., 1977. Suburbon noise control with planting and solid barrier combinations Research bulletin p. 100. Lincoln: EM.
[41] Reethof G. and Heisler GM., 1976. Trees and forest for noise abatement and visual screening. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, NE-22, pp. 39-48.
[42] Urgenc S., 1998. Genel Plantasyon ve Agaçlandırma Teknigi (Arborikültür), Istanbul Üniversitesi Yayın no. 444, ISBN: 975-404- 443-0, I.Ü. Basımevi, Istanbul.
[43] Kragh J., 1979. Pilot study on railway noise attenuation by belts of trees. J. Sound Vib. 66 (3): 407-415.
[44] Fang CF and Ling DL., 2003. Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning 63:187-195.
[45] Fang CF. and Ling DL., 2005. Guidance for noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning 71: 29-34.
[46] Ozer S. and Irmak M., 2008. Determination of roadside noise reduction effectiveness of Pinus sylvestris L. and Populus nigra L. in Erzurum, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess., 144:191-197.
[47] Dursun S. and Ozdemir C., 1999. Konya ─░l Merkezinde G├╝r├╝lt├╝ Kirlili─ƒi Haritas─▒n─▒n Haz─▒rlanmas─▒, Selcuk Universty Research Fund BAP Project, 1999, Konya.
[48] Nas B., Berktay A., Ertu─ƒrul T., Ayg├╝n A. and Is─▒k M., 2004. V─▒sual─▒zat─▒on of road traff─▒c no─▒se levels us─▒ng g─▒s ─▒n the c─▒ty of Konya. 3 rd. GIS Days in Turkey. October 6-9 2004, ─░stanbul.
[49] Chepesiuk R., 2005. Decibel hell: the effects of living in a noisy world. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113(1):A35-41.
[50] Bluhm GL., Berglind N., Nordling E. and Rosenlund M., 2007. Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occup Environ Med 2007;64:122-6.