Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30455
Quantitative Precipitation Forecast using MM5 and WRF models for Kelantan River Basin
Abstract:Quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) from atmospheric model as input to hydrological model in an integrated hydro-meteorological flood forecasting system has been operational in many countries worldwide. High-resolution numerical weather prediction (NWP) models with grid cell sizes between 2 and 14 km have great potential in contributing towards reasonably accurate QPF. In this study the potential of two NWP models to forecast precipitation for a flood-prone area in a tropical region is examined. The precipitation forecasts produced from the Fifth Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale (MM5) and Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) models are statistically verified with the observed rain in Kelantan River Basin, Malaysia. The statistical verification indicates that the models have performed quite satisfactorily for low and moderate rainfall but not very satisfactory for heavy rainfall.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334506Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2541
 DID (2009) Laporan Banjir 2009-2010
 Ducrocq, V., Lafore, J.-P .,Redelsperger, J.-L.& Orain, F.(2000) Initialization of a fine-scale model for convective system prediction: a case study. Q.J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 126:3041-3065.
 Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R.: A description of the fifthgeneration Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5), NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, 1994.
 Habets, F., LeMoigne, P., and Noilhan, J. (2004) On the utility of operational precipitation forecasts to served as input for streamflow forecasting, Journal of Hydrology , 293 , pp. 270-288
 Jasper, K., Gurtz, J., and Lang, H. (2002) Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a distributed hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology. 267, pp. 40-52
 Kim, G. and Barros, A.P. (2001) Quantitative flood forecasting using multisensor data and neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 246, pp. 45-62.
 Low, K. C., 2006: Application of Nowcasting Techniques Towards Strengthening National Warning Capabilities on Hydrometeorological and Landslides Hazards.Sydney, Australia.
 Meneguzzoa, F., Pasquia, M., Mendunib, G., Messeric, G., Gozzinia, B., Grifonia, D., Rossic, M., and Maracchi, G. (2004). "Sensitivity of meteorological high-resolution numerical simulations of the biggest floods occurred over the Arno river basin, Italy, in the 20th century", Journal of Hydrology .288 pp. 37-56
 Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. M. Barker, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers (2005): "A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2". NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TND468+STR URL http://box.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/ users/docs/arw_v2.pdf.
 Snook, J. S. & Pielke, R. A. (1995) "Diagnosing a Colorado heavy snow event with a nonhydrostatic mesoscale numerical model structured for operational use.", Wea. Forecasting 10: 262-285.
 Toth, A., Brath, E. and Montanari .(2000). "Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting", Journal of Hydrology. pp. 239
 Wardah, T., Abu Bakar, S.H.,Bardossy, A., Maznorizan, M., 2008. "Use of geostationary meteorological satellite images in convective rain estimation for flash-flood forecasting". Journal of Hydrology Journal of Hydrology 356 (3-4), pp. 283-298.
 Warner, T. T., Brandes, E. A., Sun, J., Yates, D. N. & Mueller, C. K. (2000) Prediction of a flash flood in complex terrain. Part I: A comparison of rainfall estimates from radar, and very short range rainfall simulations from a dynamic model and an automated algorithmic system. J. Appl.Meteorol. 39: 797-814.
 Wilmott, C.J., Ackleson, S.G., Davis, R.E., Feddema, J.J., Klink, K.M., Legates, D.R., O'Donnell, J., Rowe, M.C., 1985. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J. Geo. Res. 90, 8995-9005.