A Training Course Development to Promote Learning Activities of 2nd Year, Faculty of Education Students using Multiple Intelligences Theory
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
A Training Course Development to Promote Learning Activities of 2nd Year, Faculty of Education Students using Multiple Intelligences Theory

Authors: Chaiwat Waree, Kalanyoo Petcharaporn

Abstract:

This research aims to develop and evaluate a training course to promote learning activities of 2nd year, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, faculty of education students using multiple intelligences theory. The process is divided into two phases: Phase 1 development of training course to promote learning activities consisting of principles, objectives of the course, structure, training duration, content, training materials, training activities, media training, monitoring, measurement and evaluation quality of the course. Phase 2 evaluation efficiency of training course was to use the improved curriculum with experimental group which is 2nd year, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, faculty of education students was drawn randomly 152 students. The experimental pattern was randomized Control Group Pre-Test Post-Test Design, Analysis Data by t-Test with the software SPFSS for Windows. Research has shown that: 1). the ability of teaching and learning according to the theory of multiple intelligences after training is higher than before training significantly in statistic at .01 level, 2). The satisfaction of students to the training courses was overall at the highest level.

Keywords: A training course, learning activities, multiple intelligences.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333466

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1358

References:


[1] D. Baron, & W.B. Harold, Evaluation technique for classroom teacher. New York: McGraw - Hill Book Company, Inc 1995.
[2] E. A. Alexandra, The Effect of Constructionism Learning in the Social Subject on Student Achievement and Analysis Thinking. Dissertation Abstracts International. 51 (November) 2004.
[3] G. O. Young, "Synthetic Ministry of Education" Conceptual Approach and Assessment of a New Alternative According to the Fundamental Education Program, Bangkok. 2001.
[4] H. Gardner, August 15. Intelligence in seven steps. (Online). Available URL: http://www.newhorizons.org/future/Creating_the_Future/crfut_gardner.h tml2005.
[5] H. Taba, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Brace & world , Inc.1972.
[6] K. Somchart, Effective Technique in Organizing Training. Bangkok.2003.
[7] L. Seri, Administrative skill and behavior of primary schools- principles after a training, Thesis of Graduate school, Silpakorn University.1999.
[8] Ministry of Education. Conceptual Approach and Assessment of a New Alternative According to the Fundamental Education Program, Bangkok.2001.
[9] Ministry of Education Fundamental Education Program, year 2008 No.2, Bangkok. 2009.
[10] R. N.Rinee, Research shown Thai Children are Growing and Stupid. Matichon newspaper, p.18.2003.
[11] R. Peera, Application of the Multiple Intelligences Theory to Reform Learning Process, Bangkok.2001.
[12] S. Fred, The Constructionism Learning in the Music, Art to Development of Student-s Relationship. . Dissertation Abstracts International. 67 (June) 2005.
[13] S. Narongrit, Particular Group Teaching Procedure. Wittayacharn Vol.4, April 1996.
[14] V. Panthanee, Teaching and Learning Thai:Problem and Solution, Bangkok.1999.