Numerical Simulation and Experiment of a Lifting Body with Leading-Edge Rotating Cylinder
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Numerical Simulation and Experiment of a Lifting Body with Leading-Edge Rotating Cylinder

Authors: A. Badarudin, C. S. Oon, S. N. Kazi, N. Nik-Ghazali, Y. J. Lee, W. T. Chong

Abstract:

An experimental and simulation flight test has been carried out to evaluate the longitudinal gliding characteristics of a lifting body with blunted half-cone geometry. The novelty here is the lifting body's pitch control mechanism, which consists of a pair of leading-edge rotating cylinders. Flight simulation uses aerodynamic data from computational fluid dynamics supported by wind-tunnel test. Flight test consists of releasing an aluminum lifting body model from a moving vehicle at the appropriate wind speed while measuring the lifting body's variation of altitude against time of flight. Results show that leading-edge rotating cylinder is able to give small amounts of improvement to the longitudinal stability and pitch control to the lifting body.

Keywords: Lifting body, pitch control, aerodynamic, rotating cylinder.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1063296

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1881

References:


[1] R.D. Reed, Wingless Flight: The Lifting Body Story, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 1997.
[2] R. Monti, D.M. Paterna, A low risk reentry: looking backward to step forward, Aerospace Science and Technology 10 (2006) 156-167.
[3] Y. Li, Y. Jiang and C. Huang, Shape design of lifting body based on genetic algorithm, International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business 2 (2010) 37-43.
[4] W.J.G. Pinsker, The Control Characteristics of Aircraft Employing Direct-Lift Control, Aeronautical Research Council, London, 1970.
[5] C.W. Alcorn, M.A. Croom, M.S. Francis and H. Ross, The X-31 Aircraft: Advanced in Aircraft Agility and Performance, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 32 (1996) 377 - 413.
[6] F.J. Lallman, J.B. Davidson and P.C. Murphy, A Method for Integrating Thrust-Vectoring and Actuated Forebody Strakes with Conventional Aerodynamic Controls on a High-Performance Fighter Airplane, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hampton, 1998.
[7] A. Seifert, S. David, I. Fono, O. Stalnov, I. Dayan, S. Bauminger, R. Guedj, S. Chester and A. Abershitz, Roll Control via Active Flow Control: From Concept Development to Flight, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 49th Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2009.
[8] M.P. Patel, T.T. Ng, Srikanth Vasudevan, T.C. Corke and C. He, Plasma Actuators for Hingeless Aerodynamic Control of an Unmanned Air Vehicle, Journal of Aircraft 44 (2007) 1264-1274.
[9] H.K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, 2nd ed., Pearson Education Limited, Essex, 2007.
[10] G. Iaccarino, A. Ooi, P.A. Durbin and M. Behnia, Reynolds Averaged Simulation of Unsteady Separated Flow, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 24 (2003) 147-156.
[11] P.R. Spalart, Strategies for Turbulence Modelling and Simulations, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 21 (2000) 252-263.
[12] A. Schutte, O.J. Boelens, M. Oehlke, A. Jirasek, T. Loeser, Prediction of flow around the X-31 aircraft using three different CFD methods, Aerospace Science and Technology 20 (2012) 21-37.
[13] P.R. Spalart and S.R. Allmaras, A One Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows, AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics), AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, United States of America, 1992.
[14] P.K. Sweby, High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 21 (1984) 995-1011.
[15] V. Klein and E.A. Morelli, Aircraft System Identification: Theory and Practice, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc, Virginia, 2006.