The Measurement of Latvian and Russian Ethnic Attitudes, Using Evaluative Priming Task and Self-Report Methods
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
The Measurement of Latvian and Russian Ethnic Attitudes, Using Evaluative Priming Task and Self-Report Methods

Authors: Maria Bambulyaka, Irina Plotka, Nina Blumenau, Dmitry Igonin, Elena Ozola, Laura Shimane

Abstract:

The purposes of researches - to estimate implicit ethnic attitudes by direct and indirect methods, to determine the accordance of two types measuring, to investigate influence of task type used in an experiment, on the results of measuring, as well as to determine a presence or communication between recent episodic events and chronologic correlations of ethnic attitudes. Method of the implicit measuring - an evaluative priming (EPT) carried out with the use of different SOA intervals, explicit methods of research are G.Soldatova-s types of ethnic identity, G.Soldatova-s index of tolerance, E.Bogardus scale of social distance. During five stages of researches received results open some aspects of implicit measuring, its correlation with the results of self-reports on different SOA intervals, connection of implicit measuring with emotional valence of episodic events of participants and other indexes, presenting a contribution to the decision of implicit measuring application problem for study of different social constructs

Keywords: Ethnic attitudes, explicit method, implicit method, priming.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061886

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1537

References:


[1] Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). -On the automatic activation of attitudes.- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 229-238.
[2] De Hower, J. (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? In: R.W. Wiers & A.W. Stacy (ed.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction, 11-28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
[3] Petty, R. E., Wheeler C.S., and Tormala Z. L. (2003), "Persuasion and Attitude Change," in Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 5, Personality and Social Psychology, ed.Theodore Millon and Melvin J. Lerner, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 353-82.
[4] Kihlstrom J. F. (2004). Availability, Accessibility, and Subliminal Perception. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):92-100.
[5] De Hower, J. (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? In: R.W. Wiers & A.W. Stacy (ed.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction, 11-28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
[6] Moors, A., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. (2010). In search of a measure that qualifies as implicit. Recommendations based on a decompositional view of automaticity. In B. Gawronski & B. Keith Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: measurement, theory and applications (pp.19-37). NY: Guilford.
[7] Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious ÔÇÿauto┬¼matic- processes: A gating framework. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289-306.
[8] Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 245-293). Berlin: Springer.
[9] Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), Unintended Thought (pp. 3-51). New York: The Guilford Press.
[10] Logan, G. D. (1989). Automaticity and cognitive control. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 52-74). New York: Guilford Press.
[11] Coane J.H., Balota D. A. (2009) Priming the Holiday Spirit: Persistent Activation due to Extra-Experimental Experiences, Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 December; 16(6): 1124-1128.
[12] Plotka, I., Igonin, D., Blumenau, N. (2008). Emotional priming in the studying of ethnic attitudes: evidence in difference for type of experimental tasks. In: The science of psychology in the changing world, 86-90. Moscow-Daugavpils: MCUPE&DU. (In Russian).
[13] Plotka I., Igonin D., Blumenau N. (2009). Research of the ethnic attitudes by the method of emotional priming. In: Proceedings of the 50. International scientific conference of Daugavpils University, 282-294. Daugavpils: Daugavpils University „Saule”. (In Russian).
[14] Plotka I., Igonin D., Blumenau, N., Bambulaka, M., & Ozola, E. (2010). Modern technologies in a social and psychological research: implicit methods of studying the ethnic attitudes. Professional Studies: Theory and Practice, 6 (pp. 166-174). ISSN 1822-3648
[15] Plotka, I., Blumenau, N., Igonin, D., Bambulaka, M., Ozola, E., & Simane, L. (2011).Implicit Methods of Attitudes Research: the Modern Approach to Education and Training of Specialists in Social Sciences. Professional Studies: Theory and Practice, 2012/9, Šiaulių valstybin÷ kolegija, Šiauliai 2012, ISSN 1822-3648, lpp. 104-111
[16] Soldatova G.U., Psychology of ethnic tensions. M., 1998.
[17] Hines, T. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgements about odd digits. Memory and Cognition, 18, 40–46.
[18] Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). ‘Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses.’ Annual Review of Psychology 54: 297–327.
[19] Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,56, 5-18.
[20] Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. (1995) ‘Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.’ Psychological Review 102: 4- 27.
[21] Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V. (2007). ’Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model.’ Social Cognition 25: 687-717.
[22] B.A.Nosek, Y. Bar-Anan, A Comparative Investigation of Seven Implicit Measures of Social Cognition, 2012, Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2074556
[23] Masson M. Isaak M., Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming Memory & Cognition, 1999, 27 (3), 399-412
[24] Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically-activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421-433.
[25] Rudman L.A. Implicit Measures for Social and Personality Psychology. SAGE Publications, 2011, pp. 96
[26] Ferguson C.J. An Effect Size Primer: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice © 2009, American Psychological Association 2009, Electronic copy available at: http://www.tamiu.edu/
[27] Wittenbrink B. , Judd C. M., and Park B. Evidence for Racial Prejudice at the Implicit Level and Its Relationship With Questionnaire Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, Vol. 72, No. 2, 262- 274р.
[28] Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416- 424.