Challenges on Adopting Scrum for Distributed Teams in Home Office Environments
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
Challenges on Adopting Scrum for Distributed Teams in Home Office Environments

Authors: Marlon Luz, Daniel Gazineu, Mauro Teófilo

Abstract:

This paper describes the two actual tendencies in the software development process usage: 'Scrum' and 'work in home office'. It-s exposed the four main challenges to adopt Scrum framework for distributed teams in this cited kind of work. The challenges are mainly based on the communication problems due distances since the Scrum encourages the team to work together in the same room, and this is not possible when people work distributed in their homes.

Keywords: Agile, Scrum, Distributed Work, Home Office.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1060108

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2358

References:


[1] Hinds, Pamela; Kiesler, Sara (edts), Distributed Work. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 2002.
[2] DeSanctis, G., and Monge, P. Introduction: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science (Special Issue).
[3] Maznevski, M. L., and Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science.
[4] Monge, R. R., and Kirste, K. K. (1980). Measuring proximity in human organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly.
[5] Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[6] Kraut, R., and Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM.
[7] Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
[8] Schwaber, K., and Beedle, M. (2002). Agile Software Development with Scrum, Prentice Hall.
[9] Kniberg, H. (2007). Scrum and XP from the Trenches. InfoQ.
[10] Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley.
[11] Sykes, R. E., Larntz, K., and Fox, J. C. (1976). Proximity and similarity effects on frequency of interaction in a class of naval recruits. Sociometry.
[12] Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A., O-Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S., and Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialog structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
[13] O-Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., and Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over videoconference: an evaluation of the spoken aspects of video mediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction.
[14] Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
[15] Daft, R., and Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organization Behavior.
[16] Clark, H., and Brennan, S. (1990). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D.C: APA Press.
[17] Kiesler, S., and Cummings, J. (2002). What Do We Know About Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? Alegacy of Research. In Hinds, Pamela; Kiesler, Sara (edts). Distributed Work. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press.
[18] Saegert, S., Swarp, W., and Zajonc, R. B. (1973). Exposure, context, and interpersonal attraction. Journal od Personality and Social Psychology.
[19] Beck, K et al (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development .
[20] Brockner, J., and Swap, W. C. (1976). Effects of repeated exposure and attitudinal similarity on self-disclosure and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[21] Ebbesen, E., Kjos, G., and Konecni, V. (1976). Spatial ecology: Its effects on the choice of friends and enemies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[22] Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[23] Newcomb, T. R. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[24] Festinger, L., Schacter, S., and Back, K. (1950). Individual and small group territories. Small Group Behavior.
[25] Insko, C., and Wilson, M. (1977). Interpersonal attraction as a function of social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[26] Hansen, M. (1999). The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly.
[27] Sillince, J.A. "A Model of Social, Emotional and Symbolic Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication within Organizations," in Computer Supported Cooperative Work, VOL. 4, 1996, pp. 1-31.
[28] Dourish, P., Bly, S. "Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed work Group". Proc. ACM CHI-92. 1992.
[29] Honda, S., Ohsawa, T., Tomioka, H., Kimura T., Okada K., and Matsushita Y. A Virtual Office Environment for Home Office Worker Based on 3D Virtual Space. 1997