Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Work Stress: Variation in Perceived Group Process and Outcomes
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32771
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Work Stress: Variation in Perceived Group Process and Outcomes

Authors: William H. O'Brien, Erin Bannon, M.A., Heather McCarren, Eileen Delaney

Abstract:

Employees commonly encounter unpredictable and unavoidable work related stressors. Exposure to such stressors can evoke negative appraisals and associated adverse mental, physical, and behavioral responses. Because Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) emphasizes acceptance of unavoidable stressors and diffusion from negative appraisals, it may be particularly beneficial for work stress. Forty-five workers were randomly assigned to an ACT intervention for work stress (n = 21) or a waitlist control group (n = 24). The intervention consisted of two 3-hour sessions spaced one week apart. An examination of group process and outcomes was conducted using the Revised Sessions Rating Scale. Results indicated that the ACT participants reported that they perceived the intervention to be supportive, task focused, and without adverse therapist behaviors (e.g., feelings of being criticized or discounted). Additionally, the second session (values clarification and commitment to action) was perceived to be more supportive and task focused than the first session (mindfulness, defusion). Process ratings were correlated with outcomes. Results indicated that perceptions of therapy supportiveness and task focus were associated with reduced psychological distress and improved perceived physical health.

Keywords: Work stress, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, therapy process.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331135

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2231

References:


[1] H. Schwetschenau, W. H. O-Brien and E. Delaney. "ACT for work stress among mental health workers and teachers." Manuscript submitted for review. 2011.
[2] F. W. Bond and D. Bunce. "Outcomes and mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem-focused worksite stress management interventions." J Occupational Health Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 156 - 163. 2000.
[3] R. Elliott and M. Wexler. "Measuring the impact of sessions in processexperiential therapy for depression." J Counseling Psychology, vol. 41, pp. 166-174. 1994.
[4] D. Goldberg. Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor, Ontario, 1978.
[5] J. E. Ware, M. Kosinski, and S. D. Keller. "A12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity." Medical Care, vol. 34, pp. 220-233. 1996.
[6] W.H. O-Brien. "Evaluating Case Formulation Decision-Making and Therapist Responsiveness: A Perspective from the Area of Behavioral Assessment and Case Formulation." Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, vol. 6, pp. 293-306. December, 2010.