The Development and Examination of a Teaching Commitment Scale for Elementary School Health and Physical Education Teachers
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
The Development and Examination of a Teaching Commitment Scale for Elementary School Health and Physical Education Teachers

Authors: Yi-Hsiang Pan, Wei-Ting Hsu, Chang-Pang Lin

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to develop and examine a Teaching Commitment Scale of Health and Physical Education (TCS-HPE) for Taiwanese elementary school teachers. First of all, based on teaching commitment related theory and literatures to develop a original scale with 40 items, later both stratified random sampling and cluster sampling were used to sample participants. During the first stage, 300 teachers were sampled and 251 valid scales (83.7%) returned. Later, the data was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis to obtain 74.30% of total variance for the construct validity. The Cronbach-s alpha coefficient of sum scale reliability was 0.94, and subscale coefficients were between 0.80 and 0.96. In the second stage, 400 teachers were sampled and 318 valid scales (79.5%) returned. Finally, this study used confirmatory factor analysis to test validity and reliability of TCS-HPE. The result showed that the fit indexes reached acceptable criteria(¤ç2 (246 ) =557.64 , p<.05, RMSEA= 0.03, GFI = 0.96, AGFI = 0.95, NFI = 0.91, CFI = 0.98, RMR = 0.04, SRMR = 0.03). In conclusion, TCS-HPE has four dimensions with 24 items, including teaching identification, teaching involvement, teaching objectives and tendency towards work continuation. It is an acceptable measurement instrument with reliability and validity.

Keywords: Attitude, belief, construct validity, teachers' professional development.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1327849

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2330

References:


[1] H. H. Lee, "A study of professional commitment and their related influence factors for elementary school teachers in Taiwan," Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Chengchi University, Taiwan, 1993.
[2] V. I. Nichols, "The impact of workplace conditions on teacher commitment, teaching and learning," ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO. AAT 3040780, 2002.
[3] R. W.Riley, M. Smith and P. D. Forgione, " Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis," Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics,1997.
[4] E. Canrinus, M. Helms-Lorenz, D. Beijaard, D. Buitink, and A. Hofman, "Self-efficacy, job satisfaction, motivation and commitment: exploring the relationships between indicators of teachers- professional identity," European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 115-132, 2012.
[5] C. Day, B. Elliot, and A. Kington, "Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment," Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 563-577,2005.
[6] M. K. Jennett, S. L. Harris, and G. B. Mesibov-s, "Commitment to philosophy, teacher efficacy, and burnout among teachers of children with autism," Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 583-593, 2003.
[7] N. Jones, and P. Youngs, "Attitudes and affect: Daily emotions and their association with the commitment and burnout of beginning teachers," Teachers College Report, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 1-36, 2012.
[8] S. Sharif, S. Kanik, A. T. Omar, and S. Sulaiman, "The relationship between teachers- empowerment and teachers- organizational commitment in rural secondary schools," International Journal of Learning, vol, 17, no. 12, pp. 245-266, 2011.
[9] S. J. Rosenholt, "Teachers- workplace: The social organization of schools," New York, NY: Longman, 1989.
[10] H. W. Ware, A. Kitsantas, "Predicting teacher commitment using principal and teacher efficacy variables: An HLM approach," The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 104, pp. 183-193, 2011.
[11] J. W. Kushman, "The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools," Educational Administration Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 5-42, 1992.
[12] W. A. Firestone and J. R. Pennell, "Teacher commitment, working conditions and differential incentive policies," Review of Educational Research, vol.63, no.4, pp.484-526, 1993.
[13] A. K. Tyree, "Analyzing teaching commitment: Theoretical and empirical dimensions," ERIC Document No. ED336365, 1991.
[14] P. A. Composto, "Collegial leadership and teacher commitment to the school," ProQuest digital dissertations, NO. AAT 3049705, 2002.
[15] T. L. Grady, "Identifying determinants of commitment and turnover behavior," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 78,pp. 306-318, 1988.
[16] C. L. Chen, "A study of professional development, teaching commitment and school efficacy in elementary school," Unpublished mater thesis, National Kaoshiung Normal University, Taiwan. 1994.
[17] R. L. Carson, and M. A. Chase, "An examination of physical education teacher motivation from a self-determination theoretical framework," Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, vol, 14, no, 4, pp-335-353, 2009.
[18] K. G. JÖreskog, and D. SÖrborn, "LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language," Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 1993.
[19] R. P. Bagozzi and Y. Yi, "On the evaluation of structural equation models," Academic of Marketing Science, vol. 16, pp. 74-94, 1988.
[20] A. Diamantopoulos, and J. A. Siguaw, "Introducing LISREL : A guide for structural equation modeling," California: Sage Publications Inc, 2000.
[21] P. M. Bentler, and D. G. Bonnet, "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 88, pp. 588-606, 1980