Development of EN338 (2009) Strength Classes for Some Common Nigerian Timber Species Using Three Point Bending Test
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Development of EN338 (2009) Strength Classes for Some Common Nigerian Timber Species Using Three Point Bending Test

Authors: Abubakar Idris, Nabade Abdullahi Muhammad

Abstract:

The work presents a development of EN338 strength classes for Strombosia pustulata, Pterygotama crocarpa, Nauclea diderrichii and Entandrophragma cyclindricum Nigerian timber species. The specimens for experimental measurements were obtained from the timber-shed at the famous Panteka market in Kaduna in the northern part of Nigeria. Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the physical and mechanical properties of the selected timber species in accordance with EN 13183-1 and ASTM D193. The mechanical properties were determined using three point bending test. The generated properties were used to obtain the characteristic values of the material properties in accordance with EN384. The selected timber species were then classified according to EN 338. Strombosia pustulata, Pterygotama crocarpa, Nauclea diderrichii and Entandrophragma cyclindricum were assigned to strength classes D40, C14, D40 and D24 respectively. Other properties such as tensile and compressive strengths parallel and perpendicular to grains, shear strength as well as shear modulus were obtained in accordance with EN 338. 

Keywords: Mechanical properties, Nigerian timber, strength classes, three-point bending test.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1086851

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 4024

References:


[1] I. Ferguson, B.La Fontaine, P.Vinden, L.Bren, R.Hateley and B.Hermesec“Environmental properties of timber,” Research Paper commissioned by FWPRDC, 1996, Australia
[2] W. R. Lawson “Timber in building construction: Ecological implications,” Research paper commissioned by the Timber Development Association (NSW) Limited and FWPRDC, 1996, Australia.
[3] J. Kohler “Reliability of timber structures,” A dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology for the degree of doctor technical sciences, 2006
[4] NCP2 “The Use of Timber for Construction,” Nigerian Standard Code of Practice, accredited by the Standard Organisation of Nigeria (SON), Federal Ministry of Industries, 1973, Lagos, Nigeria
[5] EN 1995 “Design of timber structures: Part 1-1: General – Common rules and rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardisation, CEN, 2004, Brussels, Belgium.
[6] BS 5268 “Structural use of timber Part 2: Code of Practice for permissible stress design, materials and workmanship, British Standard Institute, BSI, 2002, London.
[7] P.Glos, “Strength gradingin timber Engineering STEP 1”, 1995b, The Netherlands,pp A6/1-A6/8.
[8] JCSS “Probabilistic Model Code: Part 3: Resistance Models: Properties of Timber,” Joint Committee on Structural Safety, 12th Draft, Internet version: 2006, http://www.jcss.ethz.ch
[9] P.Glos. “Solid Timber – Strength Classes. in Timber Engineering STEP 1”,1995a, pp A7/1-A7/8. Centrum Hout, The Netherlands
[10] EN338 “Structural Timber: Strength Classes,” European Committee for Standardisation, CEN, 2009, Brussels, Belgium.
[11] J. E.Winandy “Wood Properties,”WisconsinEncyclopaedia of Agricultural Science., 1994, Orlando, FL: Academic Press: Vol. 4, p.551-554
[12] EN 13183-1 “Moisture content of a piece of sawn timber: Determination by oven Dry Method,” European Committee for Standardisation, CEN, 2002, Brussels, Belgium
[13] EN 408 “Timber structures – Structural timber and Glued-laminated timber: Determination of some physical and mechanical properties,” European Committee for Standardisation, CEN, 2003, Brussels, Belgium
[14] EN 384 “Structural timber: Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density,” European Committee for Standardisation, CEN, 2004, Brussels, Belgium.
[15] L. Bostrom “Machine strength grading, Comparison of four different systems”, Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, Building Technology SP.Report, 1994:49, 57p.
[16] K.Heikkila, and H. Herajarvi “Stiffness and strength of 45×95mm beams glued from Norway Spruce using 8 different structural models,” Conference COST E53 29-30. Delft, 2008, the Netherlands.
[17] ASTM D193 “Standard method of testing small clear specimens of timber,” American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000, USA.
[18] A. Ranta-Maurus, M. Forselius, J. Kurkela and T. Toratti“Reliability analysis of timber structures,” Nordic Industrial Fund, 2001, Technical Research Centre of Finland.