A Study of the Hand-Hold Impact on the EM Interaction of a Cellular Handset and a Human
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
A Study of the Hand-Hold Impact on the EM Interaction of a Cellular Handset and a Human

Authors: Salah I. Al-Mously, Marai M. Abousetta

Abstract:

This paper investigates the impact of the hand-hold positions on both antenna performance and the specific absorption rate (SAR) induced in the user-s head. A cellular handset with external antenna operating at GSM-900 frequency is modeled and simulated using a finite difference time-domain (FDTD)-based platform SEMCAD-X. A specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) is adopted to simulate the user-s head, whereas a semirealistic CAD-model of three-tissues is designed to simulate the user-s hand. The results show that in case of the handset in hand close to head at different positions; the antenna total efficiency gets reduced to (14.5% - 5.9%) at cheek-position and to (27.5% to 11.8%) at tilt-position. The peak averaged SAR1g values in head close to handset without hand, are 4.67 W/Kg and 2.66 W/Kg at cheek and tilt-position, respectively. Due to the presence of hand, the SAR1g in head gets reduced to (3.67-3.31 W/Kg) at cheek-position and to (1.84-1.64 W/Kg) at tilt-position, depending on the hand-hold position.

Keywords: FDTD, phantom, specific absorption rate (SAR), cellular handset exposure.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085207

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1361

References:


[1] Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices - Measurement Techniques, IEEE Standard 1528, 2003.
[2] Product Standard to Demonstrate the Compliance of Mobile Phones with the Basic Restrictions Related to Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (300 MHz - 3 GHz), EN 50360, 2001.
[3] Basic Standard for the Measurement of Specific Absorption Rate Related to Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones (300 MHz - 3 GHz), EN 50361, 2001.
[4] Procedure to Measure the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Frequency Range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz - Part 1: Hand-held Mobile Wireless Communication Devices, IEC 62209.
[5] Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Estimation for Cellular Phone, ARIB Standard-T56, 2002.
[6] Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, supplement C to OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 9701) FCC, 1997.
[7] Electromagnetic Radiation - Human Exposure, ACA Radio communications Standard, Schedules 1 and 2, 2003.
[8] S. I. Al-Mously and M. M. Abousetta, "Study of both antenna and PCB positions effect on the coupling between the cellular hand-set and human head at GSM-900 standard," iWAT IEEE-2008, International Workshop on Antenna Technology 2008, Chiba, Japan, March 4-6, 2008, to be published.
[9] J. Graffin, N. Rots and G. F. Pedersen, "Radiations phantom for handheld phones," Vehicular Technology Conference, 2000, IEEE VTSFall VTC 2000, 52nd, Volume 2, pp. 853 - 866, 24-28Sept. 2000
[10] N. Chavannes, P. Futter, R. Tay, K. Pokovic and N. Kuster, "Reliable prediction of MTE performance under real usage conditions using FDTD," in Proc. of Applied Electromagnetics and Communications 18th Int. Conf., 2005
[11] Chin-Ming Su, Chin-Hsien Wu, Kin-Lu wong, Shin-Huang Yeh and Chia-Lun Tang, "User-s hand effects on EMC internal GSM/DCS mobile phone antenna," Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2006, IEEE, 9-14 July 2006.
[12] SEMCAD-X Reference Manual, SEMCAD Simulation Platform for Electromagnetic Compatibility, Antenna Design and Dosimetry," SPEAG - Schmid&Partner Engineering AG. (http://www.semcad.com)
[13] K. Ogawa and T. Uwano, "A diversity Antenna for very small 800-MHz band portable telephones," IEEE Trans. Antenna and Propagation, vol. 42, No. 9, September 1994.
[14] B. B. Beard, W. Kainz, T. Onishi, T. Iyama, S. Watanabe, O. Fujiwara, J. Wang, G. Bit-Babik, A. Faraone, J. Wiart, A. Christ, N. Kuster, A. Lee, H. Kroeze, M. Siegbahn, J. Keshvari, H. Abrishamkar, W. Simon, D. Manteuffel, and N. Nikoloski, "Comparisons of computed mobile phone induced SAR in the SAM phantom to that in anatomically correct models of the human head," IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 48, No. 2, MAY 2006.
[15] Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, Amendment 2: Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Limits for the Pinna, IEEE Standard C95.1b- 2004, Dec. 2004.
[16] H. Arai, Measurement of Mobile Antenna Systems, Artech House Inc, 2001.
[17] Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Associated with the Use of Wireless Handsets - Computational Techniques, IEEE draft Standard-1529.
[18] L. Kuo, Y. Kan and H. Chuang, "Analysis of A 900/1800-MHz dualband gap loop antenna on a handset with proximate head and hand model," Journal of Electromagnetics Waves and Applications, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 107-122, 2007.