Systematic Analysis of Dynamic Association of Health Outcomes with Computer Usage for Office Staff
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Systematic Analysis of Dynamic Association of Health Outcomes with Computer Usage for Office Staff

Authors: Xiaoshu Lu, Esa-Pekka Takala, Risto Toivonen

Abstract:

This paper systematically investigates the timedependent health outcomes for office staff during computer work using the developed mathematical model. The model describes timedependent health outcomes in multiple body regions associated with computer usage. The association is explicitly presented with a doseresponse relationship which is parametrized by body region parameters. Using the developed model we perform extensive investigations of the health outcomes statically and dynamically. We compare the risk body regions and provide various severity rankings of the discomfort rate changes with respect to computer-related workload dynamically for the study population. Application of the developed model reveals a wide range of findings. Such broad spectrum of investigations in a single report literature is lacking. Based upon the model analysis, it is discovered that the highest average severity level of the discomfort exists in neck, shoulder, eyes, shoulder joint/upper arm, upper back, low back and head etc. The biggest weekly changes of discomfort rates are in eyes, neck, head, shoulder, shoulder joint/upper arm and upper back etc. The fastest discomfort rate is found in neck, followed by shoulder, eyes, head, shoulder joint/upper arm and upper back etc. Most of our findings are consistent with the literature, which demonstrates that the developed model and results are applicable and valuable and can be utilized to assess correlation between the amount of computer-related workload and health risk.

Keywords: Computer-related workload, health outcomes, dynamic association, dose-response relationship, systematic analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1081401

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1244

References:


[1] D.M. Rempel, N. Krause, R. Goldberg, D. Benner, M. Hudes and G.U. Goldner, "A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of two workstation interventions on upper body pain and incident musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators", Occup Environ Med, vol 63, pp300-306, 2006.
[2] B. Juul-Kristensen and C. Jensen, "Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: The "BIT" follow up study on office workers", Occup Environ Med, vol 62, pp188-194, 2005.
[3] F. Gerr, M. Marcus, D. Ensor, D. Kleinbaum, S. Cohen, A. Edwards, E. Gentry, D.J. Ortiz and C. Monteilh, "A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders", Am. J. Ind. Med, vol 41, pp221-235, 2002.
[4] L. Punnett and U. Bergqvist, "Visual display unit work and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders, Arbete och hälsa, vol 16, pp1-161, 1997.
[5] D. Treaster, W.S. Marras, D. Burr, J.E. Sheedy and D. Hart, "Myofascial trigger point development from visual and postural stressors during computer work", J Electromyogr Kinesiol., vol 16, no 2, pp115-124, apr, 2006.
[6] X. Lu and E-P. Takala, "A novel mathematical approach for modelling and characterising time-dependent musculoskeletal outcomes for office staff", Statistics in Medicine, in press.
[7] X. Lu, R. Toivonen and E-P. Takala, "Exploring time-dependent health outcomes for office Staff", Human Factors and Ergonomics Manufacturing, in press.
[8] R. Ketola, R. Toivonen, M. Häkkänen, R. Luukkonen, E-P. Takala and E. Viikari-Juntura, "Effects of ergonomics intervention in work with video display units", Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health, vol 28, pp18-24, 2002.
[9] M.J. Smith, B.G.F. Cohen and L.W. Stammerjohn, "An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations", Hum Factors, vol 23, pp387-400, 1981.
[10] J.E. Sheedy, "VDTs and vision complaints", Information Display, vol 4, pp20-23, 1992