Evaluation of Risk Attributes Driven by Periodically Changing System Functionality
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Evaluation of Risk Attributes Driven by Periodically Changing System Functionality

Authors: Dariusz Dymek, Leszek Kotulski

Abstract:

Modeling of the distributed systems allows us to represent the whole its functionality. The working system instance rarely fulfils the whole functionality represented by model; usually some parts of this functionality should be accessible periodically. The reporting system based on the Data Warehouse concept seams to be an intuitive example of the system that some of its functionality is required only from time to time. Analyzing an enterprise risk associated with the periodical change of the system functionality, we should consider not only the inaccessibility of the components (object) but also their functions (methods), and the impact of such a situation on the system functionality from the business point of view. In the paper we suggest that the risk attributes should be estimated from risk attributes specified at the requirements level (Use Case in the UML model) on the base of the information about the structure of the model (presented at other levels of the UML model). We argue that it is desirable to consider the influence of periodical changes in requirements on the enterprise risk estimation. Finally, the proposition of such a solution basing on the UML system model is presented.

Keywords: Risk assessing, software maintenance, UML, graph grammars.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1081067

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1346

References:


[1] R. Allen, R. Douence and D. Garlan, "Specifying and Analyzing Dynamic Software Architectures", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1382, pp. 21-36, 1998.
[2] J.C. Alberts and J.D. Audrey, "Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP): Assessing Risk in Complex Environments", Technical Report CMU/SEI-2005-TN-032, 2005.
[3] R. Bahsoon and W. Emmerich "Evaluating Software Architectures: Development, Stability, and Evolution", Proceedings of ACS/IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Systems and Applications, Tunis, Tunisia, July, 2003
[4] D. Dymek and L. Kotulski, "On Hierarchical Composition of the Risk Management Evaluation in the Computer Information Systems", accepted for 25-th IASTED Multi-international Conference on Applied Informatics, Software Engineering, February 13-15, Insbruck, 2007.
[5] R. Kazman, L. Bass, G. Abowd, and M. Webb, "SAAM: A Method for Analyzing the Properties of Software Architecture", International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 81-90, 1994.
[6] R. Kazman, M. Klein and P. Clements, "ATAM, Method for Architecture Evaluation", Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004, 2000.
[7] M. Klain and R. Kazman, "Atribute-Based Architectural Styles", Technical Report CMU/SEI-99-TR-022, 1999.
[8] L. Kotulski, ÔÇ×Model wspomagania generacji oprogramowania w środowisku rozproszonym za pomoc─à gramatyk grafowych - DSc degree", Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Krak├│w, ISBN 83-233-1391-1, 2000.
[9] L. Kotulski, "Nested Software Structure Maintained by aedNLC graph grammar"- Proceedings of the 24th IASTED International Multi- Conference Software Engineering, February 14-16, pp 335-339, Innsbruck, Austria, 2006.
[10] OMG-Unified Modeling Language, v2.0. www.rational.com