The Socio-Technical Indicator Model: Socially-Sensitive CMC Technology, with an Implementation of Representative Moderation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
The Socio-Technical Indicator Model: Socially-Sensitive CMC Technology, with an Implementation of Representative Moderation

Authors: Zach-Amaury Boufoy-Bastick, Lenandlar Singh

Abstract:

Computer-mediated communication technologies which provide for virtual communities have typically evolved in a cross-dichotomous manner, such that technical constructs of the technology have evolved independently from the social environment of the community. The present paper analyses some limitations of current implementations of computer-mediated communication technology that are implied by such a dichotomy, and discusses their inhibiting effects on possible developments of virtual communities. A Socio-Technical Indicator Model is introduced that utilizes integrated feedback to describe, simulate and operationalise increasing representativeness within a variety of structurally and parametrically diverse systems. In illustration, applications of the model are briefly described for financial markets and for eco-systems. A detailed application is then provided to resolve the aforementioned technical limitations of moderation on the evolution of virtual communities. The application parameterises virtual communities to function as self-transforming social-technical systems which are sensitive to emergent and shifting community values as products of on-going communications within the collective.

Keywords: Virtual community, e-democracy, feedback systems, moderation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075775

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1526

References:


[1] Barry P.,Dekel U., Moraveji N., Weisz J. (2004). Increasing contribution in online communities using alternative displays of community activity levels. CHI 2004, April 24-29, 2004.
[2] Blanchard, A. L. and Markus, M. L. (2002). Sense of virtual community - Maintaining the experience of belonging. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Volume 8.
[3] Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L., Riedl, J. and CommunityLab (2005). How oversight improves member maintained communities. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2005, Portland, OR.
[4] Farrand, Max (1937). The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. Rev. ed. Vol. 2. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 2 2007401
[5] Greening, D. R. (1989). Experiences With Cooperative Moderation of a Usenet Newsgroup. Proceedings of the 1989 ACM/IEEE Workshop on Applied Computing.
[6] Kelly, Sung, et al. (2002). Designing for Improved Social Responsibility, User Participation and Content in On-Line Communities. CHI Volume 1, Issue 1. ACM Press: New York.
[7] Kollock, P., Smith, M. (1996). Managing the Virtual Commons: Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities Pp. 109-128 in Herring, S. (ed.). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[8] Lampe, C., Resnick, P. (2004). Slash(dot) and Burn: Distributed Moderation in a Large Online Conversation Space. Proceedings of ACM Computer Human Interaction Conference, Vienna Austria.
[9] andfield, K. (2001). NetNews Moderator's Handbook. Retrieved March 23rd, 2005, from: http://www.landfield.com/usenet/moderators/handbook/
[10] Li, H. (2004). Virtual Community Studies: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, New York, August 2004, pp. 2608-2715.
[11] Ludford, P.J., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., & Terveen, L. (2004). Think Different: Increasing Online Community Participation Using Uniqueness and Group Dissimilarity. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria, pp. 631-638.
[12] Mabry, E. (1996). Frames and Flames: The structure of argumentative messages on the 'net. In Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M. and Rafaeli, S. (eds). Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press.
[13] Nonnecke, B., Preece, J. (2000). Persistence and Lurkers in Discussion Lists: A Pilot Study. Retrieved May 29th, 2005, from: http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2000/0493/03/04933031.pdf
[14] phpBB (n/d). phpBB 2.0 Full Guide. Retrieved March 27th, 2005, from: www.uscgaparents.org/phpBB2/fullguide.pdf
[15] inaldi, A.H. (1998). The Net: User Guidelines and Netiquette. Retrieved March 23rd, 2005 from: http://www.fau.edu/netiquette/net/.
[16] Whittaker, S., L. Terveen, W. Hill, & L. Cherny (1998): The Dynamics of Mass Interaction. In CSCW 98, Seattle, Washington, USA. ACM, pp. 257-264.
[17] Zakon, R. (1997). Request for Comments: 2235 (RFC2235). Network Working Group.