Comparing the Behaviour of the FRP and Steel Reinforced Shear Walls under Cyclic Seismic Loading in Aspect of the Energy Dissipation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Comparing the Behaviour of the FRP and Steel Reinforced Shear Walls under Cyclic Seismic Loading in Aspect of the Energy Dissipation

Authors: H. Rahman, T. Donchev, D. Petkova

Abstract:

Earthquakes claim thousands of lives around the world annually due to inadequate design of lateral load resisting systems particularly shear walls. Additionally, corrosion of the steel reinforcement in concrete structures is one of the main challenges in construction industry. Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) reinforcement can be used as an alternative to traditional steel reinforcement. FRP has several excellent mechanical properties than steel such as high resistance to corrosion, high tensile strength and light self-weight; additionally, it has electromagnetic neutrality advantageous to the structures where it is important such as hospitals, some laboratories and telecommunications. This paper is about results of experimental research and it is incorporating experimental testing of two medium-scale concrete shear wall samples; one reinforced with Basalt FRP (BFRP) bar and one reinforced with steel bars as a control sample. The samples are tested under quasi-static-cyclic loading following modified ATC-24 protocol standard seismic loading. The results of both samples are compared to allow a judgement about performance of BFRP reinforced against steel reinforced concrete shear walls. The results of the conducted researches show a promising momentum toward utilisation of the BFRP as an alternative to traditional steel reinforcement with the aim of improving durability with suitable energy dissipation in the reinforced concrete shear walls.  

Keywords: Shear walls, internal FRP reinforcement, cyclic loading, energy dissipation and seismic behaviour.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12488957

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 660

References:


[1] H. Rahman, T. Donchev, T. Petkova, D. Jurgelans and G. Hopartean, Behaviour of Concrete Shear Wall with BFRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Proceedings of FRPRCS-14 Conference, Belfast, UK (2019)
[2] N. Mohamed, A. Farghaly, B. Benmokrane and K. Neale, Evaluation of GFRP-Reinforced Shear Walls, CSCE General Conference, Quebec Canada, May (2013)
[3] Maleki, A., Donchev, T., Hadavinia, H., Limbachiya, M. (2012) Improving the seismic resistance of structures using FRP/steel shear walls. Proc. 6th International Conference CICE 2012, Rome, Italy, 13-15 June 2012.
[4] Petkune, N., Donchev, T., Hadavinia, H., Limbachiya, M., Wertheim, D. (2016) Performance of pristine and retrofitted hybrid steel/fibre reinforced polymer composite shear walls. Construction and Building Materials, Elsevier, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.013 ISSN 0950-0618
[5] MagmaTech, RockBar Brochure, link http://magmatech.co.uk/downloads/RockBar.pdf (2019)
[6] Micro Measurement A VPG Brand. General Purpose Strain Gauges – Linear Pattern; 2019. http://www.vishaypg.com/docs/11241/125uw.pdf
[7] Tokyo Measuring Instruments Lab, Concrete Material Use Strain Gauges; 2019. https://tml.jp/e/product/strain_gauge/concrete.html#p_list.html
[8] Applied Technology Council, 1992, “Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures,” ATC-24, Redwood City, CA.