A Preliminary Study of the Reconstruction of Urban Residential Public Space in the Context of the “Top-down” Construction Model in China: Based on Research of TianZiFang District in Shanghai and Residential Space in Hangzhou
With the economic growth and rapid urbanization after the reform and openness, some of China's fast-growing cities have demolished former dwellings and built modern residential quarters. The blind, incomplete reference to western modern cities and the one-off construction lacking feedback mechanism have intensified such phenomenon, causing the citizen gradually expanded their living scale with the popularization of car traffic, and the peer-to-peer lifestyle gradually settled. The construction of large-scale commercial centers has caused obstacles to small business around the residential areas, leading to space for residents' interaction has been compressed. At the same time, the advocated Central Business District (CBD) model even leads to the unsatisfactory reconstruction of many historical blocks such as the Hangzhou Southern Song Dynasty Imperial Street. However, the popularity of historical spaces such as Wuzhen and Hongcun also indicates the collective memory and needs of the street space for Chinese residents. The evolution of Shanghai TianZiFang also proves the importance of the motivation of space participants in space construction in the context of the “top-down” construction model in China. In fact, there are frequent occurrences of “reconstruction”, which may redefine the space, in various residential areas. If these activities can be selectively controlled and encouraged, it will be beneficial to activate the public space as well as the residents’ intercourse, so that the traditional Chinese street space can be reconstructed in the context of modern cities.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3455741Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 197
 Yang Keyang, Discussion on the Differences between Eastern and Western Cultures in Combination with the "Lifang System", Shanxi Architecture, 2015, 41(18):6-7.
 Tan Lulu, Research on the general design of outdoor communication space in urban communities, Hunan University of Technology, 2014.
 Kang Chen, Micro-politics of the evolution of urban spatial form–A study of the spatial form of Tianzifang in Luwan District, Shanghai, Journal of Gansu Institute of Administration, 2013(01):43-55+127.
 Zheng Shiqing & Wang Dawu, Analysis of Wuzhen Tourism Development Model, Regional Research and Development, 2012, 31(05): 85-88+94.
 Shao Dawei, Research on the evolution, mechanism and optimization of urban open space pattern, Nanjing Normal University, 2011.
 Zhu Xiaoming & Gu Xiaoying, Analysis of 4 Cases of Protection and Renewal of Shikumen Lane in Shanghai, Residential Science & Technology, 2010, 30(06):25-29.
 Huang Luxin, Xie Pengfei, Jing Feng & Kuang Xiuqin, Overview of China's Urban Planning for 30 Years (1978-2008), International Urban Planning, 2009, 23 (01): 1-8.
 Mei Qing & Chen Huiqian. Discussion on the research of Shanghai Shikumen and its sustainable development, Journal of Architecture, 2008(04):85-88.
 Liu Ji, Zhou Bo & Chen Lan. Analysis of the Forms of Ancient Chinese Cities under the Lifang System–Taking Tang Chang'an as an Example, Sichuan Building Science Research, 2007(06):171-174.
 A. H. Maslow, A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, 1943, 50(4): 370-396.
 Jan Gehl, Life Between Buildings, 4th ed, China Architecture Industry Press, Beijing, 2002, pp. 50-60.
 Li Hequn, On the Collapse of the Lifang System in Ancient China–Taking Tang Chang'an and Song Bianliang as Examples, Social Sciences,2007(12):132-138.
 Song Wenhui. Research on the transition space of urban collective housing, Dalian University of Technology, 2006.
 Zhou Wei. Preliminary study on the design of residential space environment to promote communication, Chongqing University, 2005.