{"title":"Improving Flash Flood Forecasting with a Bayesian Probabilistic Approach: A Case Study on the Posina Basin in Italy","authors":"Zviad Ghadua, Biswa Bhattacharya","volume":149,"journal":"International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering","pagesStart":325,"pagesEnd":332,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10010337","abstract":"
The Flash Flood Guidance (FFG) provides the rainfall amount of a given duration necessary to cause flooding. The approach is based on the development of rainfall-runoff curves, which helps us to find out the rainfall amount that would cause flooding. An alternative approach, mostly experimented with Italian Alpine catchments, is based on determining threshold discharges from past events and on finding whether or not an oncoming flood has its magnitude more than some critical discharge thresholds found beforehand. Both approaches suffer from large uncertainties in forecasting flash floods as, due to the simplistic approach followed, the same rainfall amount may or may not cause flooding. This uncertainty leads to the question whether a probabilistic model is preferable over a deterministic one in forecasting flash floods. We propose the use of a Bayesian probabilistic approach in flash flood forecasting. A prior probability of flooding is derived based on historical data. Additional information, such as antecedent moisture condition (AMC) and rainfall amount over any rainfall thresholds are used in computing the likelihood of observing these conditions given a flash flood has occurred. Finally, the posterior probability of flooding is computed using the prior probability and the likelihood. The variation of the computed posterior probability with rainfall amount and AMC presents the suitability of the approach in decision making in an uncertain environment. The methodology has been applied to the Posina basin in Italy. From the promising results obtained, we can conclude that the Bayesian approach in flash flood forecasting provides more realistic forecasting over the FFG.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tT. Loster, \u201cFlood Trends and Global Change.\u201d Paper presented at the EuroConference on Global Change and Catastrophe Risk Management, HASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 6-9 June, 1999. \r\n[2]\tWMO\/GWP, WMO, GWP, IMGW (Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Poland), \u201cRecent Experiences from Central and Eastern Europe.\u201d Guidance on Flash Flood Management, 2007. Last accessed on 10 August 2015, www.gwp.org\/Global\/GWP...\/Floods-guidance.pdf. \r\n[3]\tNOAA, COMET, \u201cFlash Flood Early Warning System Reference Guide\u201d, 2010. Accessed on 10 August 2015 www.meted.ucar.edu\/communities\/hazwarnsys\/ffewsrg\/FF_EWS.pdf.\r\n[4]\tG. Smith, \u201cDetemining the Hydrologic Response of FFMP Basins to Heavy Rain by Analyzing their Physiographic Charachteristics.\u201d Flash Flood Potential, pp 11, 2003 (Aailable from the NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center at http:\/\/www.cbrfc.noaa.gov\/papers\/ffp_wpap.pdf.\r\n[5]\tM. Borga, E. Gaume, M. Martina, and J. Thielen, \u201cRealtime Guidance for Flash Flood Risk Management.\u201d FLOODsite, pp. 37-77, 2009.\r\n[6]\tS. Reed, J. Schaake, V. Koren, D. J. Seo, M. Smith, \u201cA statistical-distributed modeling approach for flash flood prediction\u201d. Hydrology Laboratory, Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland, 2004.\r\n[7]\tS. Reed, S. Schaake, and Z. Zhang, \u201cA distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged location.\u201d J. Hydrol. 337, 402\u2013420, 2007.\r\n[8]\tB. A. Cosgrove et al. \u201cOverview and Initial Evaluation of the Distributed Hydrological Model Threshold Frequency (DHM-TF) Flash Flood Forecasting System, NOAA Technical Report NWS 54, March 2012.\r\n[9]\tD. R. Greene, M. D. Hudlow, \u201cHydrometeorological grid mapping procedures, International Symposium on Hydrometeorology, American Water Resources Associations, Denver, Colorado., 14-17 June 1982.\r\n[10]\tR. Krzysztofowicz, \u201cBayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model.\u201d Water Resour. Res., 35, 2739\u20132750. 1999.\r\n[11]\tV. N. Steenbergen, J. Ronsyn, P. Willems, and V. K. Eerdenbrugh, \u201cA Data-Based Probabilistic Approach to Calculate and Visualise the Uncertainty of Flood Forecasts.\u201d Verlag der Technischen Universitat Graz, pp. 177-182, 2010.\r\n[12]\tM. Berti, M. Martina, S. Franceschini, S. Pignone, A. Simoni, and M. Pizziolo, \u201cProbabilistic rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence using a Bayesian approach.\u201d Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 117-4, Article ID F04006, 2012.\r\n[13]\tM. L. V. Martina, E. Todini, and A. Libralon, \u201cA Bayesian decision approach to rainfall thresholds based flood warning.\u201d Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, pp. 413-426, 2006.\r\n[14]\tD. R. Cox, \u201cFrequentist and Bayesian Statistics.\u201d A Critique, N.p.: n.p., 2006. M. H. P Ambaum, \u201cFrequentist vs Bayesian statistics\u2014 a non-statisticians view.\u201d University of Reading, UK, 2012.\r\n[15]\tM. H. P. Ambaum, \u201cFrequentist vs Bayesian statistics\u2014 a non-statisticians view.\u201d University of Reading, UK, 2012.\r\n[16]\tA. Onisko, M. J. Druzdzel, and H. Wasyluk, \u201cLearning Bayesian Network Parameters from Small Data Sets: Application of Noisy-OR Gates.\u201d International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, pp. 165\u2013182, 2001.\r\n[17]\tSoil Conservation Service (1972) Hydrology. National Engineering Hand book, Sec. 4, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington D.C.\r\n[18]\tK. P. Georgakakos, R. Graham, R. Jubach, T. M. Modrick, E. Shamir, C. Spencer, and J. A. Sperfclage, \u201cGlobal Flash Flood Guidance System.\u201d Phase I, Technical Report #9, Hydrologic Research Center \u2013 San Diego, USAID\/WMO, 2013.\r\n[19]\tP. Sayers, L. Yuanyuan, G. G. Galloway, E. Penning-Rowsell, S. Fuxin, W. Kang, C. Yiwei, and T. L. Quesne, \u201cFlood Risk Management\u201d, Asian Development Bank, GIWP, UNESCO, and WWF-UK.pp.50-53, 2013.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 149, 2019"}