Inductive Grammar, Student-Centered Reading, and Interactive Poetry: The Effects of Teaching English with Fun in Schools of Two Villages in Lebanon

Authors: Talar Agopian

Abstract:

Teaching English as a Second Language (ESL) is a common practice in many Lebanese schools. However, ESL teaching is done in traditional ways. Methods such as constructivism are seldom used, especially in villages. Here lies the significance of this research which joins constructivism and Piaget’s theory of cognitive development in ESL classes in Lebanese villages. The purpose of the present study is to explore the effects of applying constructivist student-centered strategies in teaching grammar, reading comprehension, and poetry on students in elementary ESL classes in two villages in Lebanon, Zefta in South Lebanon and Boqaata in Mount Lebanon. 20 English teachers participated in a training titled “Teaching English with Fun”, which focused on strategies that create a student-centered class where active learning takes place and there is increased learner engagement and autonomy. The training covered three main areas in teaching English: grammar, reading comprehension, and poetry. After participating in the training, the teachers applied the new strategies and methods in their ESL classes. The methodology comprised two phases: in phase one, practice-based research was conducted as the teachers attended the training and applied the constructivist strategies in their respective ESL classes. Phase two included the reflections of the teachers on the effects of the application of constructivist strategies. The results revealed the educational benefits of constructivist student-centered strategies; the students of teachers who applied these strategies showed improved engagement, positive attitudes towards poetry, increased motivation, and a better sense of autonomy. Future research is required in applying constructivist methods in the areas of writing, spelling, and vocabulary in ESL classrooms of Lebanese villages.

Keywords: Active learning, constructivism, learner engagement, student-centered strategies.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2643659

References:

[1] S. Olusegun, “Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning,” Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 66–70, Dec. 2015.
[2] S. A. McLeod. (2018, June). Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development. (Online). Available: https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
[3] Q. Jia, “A brief study on the implication of constructivism teaching theory on classroom teaching reform in basic education,” International Education Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–199, May 2010.
[4] H. Kanuka and T. Anderson, “Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: constructing order out of the chaos in the literature,” Radical Pedagogy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–25, June 2007.
[5] A. L. Odom and C. V. Bell, “Associations of middle school student science achievement and attitudes about science with student-reported frequency of teacher lecture demonstrations and student-centered learning,” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–97, Jan. 2015.
[6] L. Abeysekera and P. Dawson, “Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research,” Higher Education Research and Development, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015.
[7] J. W. Santrock, Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018, pp. 40–49.
[8] J. E. Ormrod, Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. New Jersey: Pearson, 2006, pp. 25–26.
[9] B. Lefa, “The Piaget theory of cognitive development: educational implications,” Educational Psychology, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1–8, Sept. 2014.
[10] P. D. Eggen and D. P. Kauchak, Strategies and Models for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. Boston: Pearson, 2006, pp. 129–156.
[11] C. E. Haight, C. Herron, and S. P. Cole, “The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language college classroom,” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 288–310, 2007.
[12] I. M. Al-Faki and A. G. Siddiek, “The role of background knowledge in enhancing reading comprehension,” World Journal of English Language, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 42–66, Dec. 2013.
[13] V. Morrison and L. Wlodarczyk, “Revisiting read-aloud: instructional strategies that encourage students' engagement with texts,” The Reading Teacher, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 110–118, Oct. 2009.
[14] S. I. K. Gönen, “Implementing poetry in the language class: a poetry-teaching framework for prospective English language teachers,” Advances in Language and Literary Studies, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 28–42, Oct. 2018.
[15] R. Mittal, “Poetry is language at its most distilled and powerful: bringing poetry in language classes can make language understanding and communication skills better,” Linguistics and Literature Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2016.
[16] L. Candy. (2006, Nov.). Practice based research: a guide. (Online). Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257944497_Practice_Based_Research_A_Guide