Guidelines for Sustainable Urban Mobility in Historic Districts from International Experiences
Authors: Tamer ElSerafi
In recent approaches to heritage conservation, the whole context of historic areas becomes as important as the single historic building. This makes the provision of infrastructure and network of mobility an effective element in the urban conservation. Sustainable urban conservation projects consider the high density of activities, the need for a good quality access system to the transit system, and the importance of the configuration of the mobility network by identifying the best way to connect the different districts of the urban area through a complex unique system that helps the synergic development to achieve a sustainable mobility system. A sustainable urban mobility is a key factor in maintaining the integrity between socio-cultural aspects and functional aspects. This paper illustrates the mobility aspects, mobility problems in historic districts, and the needs of the mobility systems in the first part. The second part is a practical analysis for different mobility plans. It is challenging to find innovative and creative conservation solutions fitting modern uses and needs without risking the loss of inherited built resources. Urban mobility management is becoming an essential and challenging issue in the urban conservation projects. Depending on literature review and practical analysis, this paper tries to define and clarify the guidelines for mobility management in historic districts as a key element in sustainability of urban conservation and development projects. Such rules and principles could control the conflict between the socio–cultural and economic activities, and the different needs for mobility in these districts in a sustainable way. The practical analysis includes a comparison between mobility plans which have been implemented in four different cities; Freiburg in Germany, Zurich in Switzerland and Bray Town in Ireland. This paper concludes with a matrix of guidelines that considers both principles of sustainability and livability factors in urban historic districts.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317366Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 369
References:Cranckshaw, N. (2008). Creating Vibrant Public Spaces: Streetscape Design in Commercial and Historic Districts. London: Island Press.
 Power, A. (2001). Social exclusion and urban sprawl: Is the rescue of cities possible? Regional Studies, 35(8), 731-742.
 Rodrigue, J., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2013). The Geography of Transport Systems (3rd Edition ed.). Routledge.
 Deacon, J., Edwins, S., Harris, R., & Leggett, H. (1976). Urban Transportation and Land Use. Washington: Dept. of Transportation, Office of University Research.
 Carvalho, A. (2009). Pousada em Tiradentes: uma edificação marcando seu presente, num histórico passado colonial. UFJF.
 Camagni, R., Gibelli, M., & RigamontiI, P. (2002). Urban Mobility and Urban Form: The Social and Environmental Costs of Different Patterns of Urban Expansion. Ecological Economics 40, 199-216.
 Watkiss, P., Eyre, N., Holland, M., Rabl, A., & Short, N. (2001). Impacts of Air Pollution on Building Materials. Pollution Atmosphérique.
 Rainer, J. (1982). Effect of Vibrations on Historic Buildings: An Overview. The Association for Preservation Technology Bulletin, 2-10.
 Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2007). Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39, 364-371.
 Horton, D., Rosen, P., & Cox, P. (2007). Cycling and Society. Oxon, UK: Ashgate Publishing Group.
 Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy 15, 73-80.
 Marshall, S. (2001). The Challenge of Sustainable Transport. (A. Layard, S. Davoudi, S. Batty, & P. f. Future, Eds.) London: Spon.
 Banister, D., & Marshall, S. (2000). Encouraging Transport Alternatives: Good Practice in Reducing Travel. London: The Stationery Office.
 Bray Town Council. (2010). Bray Town Development Plan 2011 to 2017. Wicklow: Bray Town Council.
 Google Earth Images 2017.
 (2015). Retrieved June 10, 2015, from Rail Users Ireland: http://forum.platform11.org/showthread.php?p=22387
 Thaler, R., van de Riet, O., Posch, K., Auwerx, P., Bousse, Y., McLean, Viinikainen, T. (2013). Mobility management: The smart way to sustainable mobility in European countries, regions and cities. Brussels: EPOMM - European Platform on Mobility Management.
 Spoerri, A. (2007). Nachhaltiges Mobilitätsmanagement, Programm und Aktivitäten. Zurich: Civil Engineering and Waste Department.
 Civil Engineering and Waste Management Department. (2013). Urban Traffic Programme “Stadtverkehr 2025”. Zurich: Civil Engineering and Waste Management Department.
 City of Zurich, D. o. (2010). Mobility in. Zurich: Dept. of Infrastructure and Transport, Mobility + Planning.
 Buck, M., & Meier-Bukowiecki, Y. (2011). Ten Years of the Zurich Mobility Strategy-Lessons Learned and Outlook. World Road Congress. Mexico.
 Gregory, R. (2011, January). Germany-Freiburg-Green City. Retrieved March 4th, 2016, from The EcoTipping Points Project: http://www.ecotippingpoints.org/our-stories/indepth/germany-freiburg-sustainability-transportation-energy-green-economy.html.
 Breyer, F., Richter, M., Kern, N., Lang, F., Halter, M., Horstkötter, N., . . . Ahuis, M. (2011). Green City Freiburg; Approaches to Sustainability. Freiburg: Freiburg Wirtschaft Touristik und Messe GmbH & Co. KG.
 Garten- und Tiefbauamt Dept. (2013, Sept. 10). Die Freiburger Verkehrskonzeption (The Freiburg Transportation Concept). Retrieved March 19, 2016, from Stadt Freiburg-(Freiburg City): http://www.freiburg.de/pb/,Lde/231648.html.
 Kunkel, P. (2011). Environmental Policy in Freiburg. Freiburg: Stadt Freiburg im Breisgau.
 RVF. (2016). WelcomeKarte. Retrieved March 19, 2016, from Regio-Verkehrsverbund Freiburg: https://www.rvf.de/welcomekarte-english.php.