Methods for Preparation of Soil Samples for Determination of Trace Elements
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32769
Methods for Preparation of Soil Samples for Determination of Trace Elements

Authors: S. Krustev, V. Angelova, K. Ivanov, P. Zaprjanova

Abstract:

It is generally accepted that only about ten microelements are vitally important to all plants, and approximately ten more elements are proved to be significant for the development of some species. The main methods for their determination in soils are the atomic spectral techniques - AAS and ICP-OAS. Critical stage to obtain correct results for content of heavy metals and nutrients in the soil is the process of mineralization. A comparative study of the most widely spread methods for soil sample preparation for determination of some trace elements was carried out. Three most commonly used methods for sample preparation were used as follows: ISO11466, EPA Method 3051 and BDS ISO 14869-1. Their capabilities were assessed and their bounds of applicability in determining the levels of the most important microelements in agriculture were defined.

Keywords: Comparative study, mineralization methods, trace elements.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132361

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1161

References:


[1] H.J.M. Bowen., Environmental Chemistry of the Element, Academic Press, New York,1979,333.
[2] A. Kabata-Pendias, and H. Pendias,” Trace elements in soil and plants”. 3nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001
[3] B. J. Alloway, D.C. Ayres, Chemical Principals of Environmental Pollution, 1st edition, Springer-Verlag,140-174, 1994.
[4] D.C. Adriano, Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
[5] A. L. Ward, M. Arciello, L. Carrara, V. Luciano, „Simultaneous determination of major, minor and trace elements ia agricultural and biological samples by inductively coupled argon plasma spectrometry”, Spectroscopy letters,13 (11), 803-831, 1980.
[6] Pyle, S., J. Nocerino, S. Deming, J. Palasota and J. Palasota.1996. Comparison of AAS, ICP-AES, PSA and XRF in determining lead and cadmium in soil. Environ.Sci.Technol, 30: 204-213
[7] Poykio, S., H. Torvela, P. Peramaki and T. Ronkkomaki. 2000. Comparison of dissolution methods for multi-element analysis of some plant materials used as a bioindicator of sulphur and heavy metal deposition determined by ICP-AES and ICP-MS. Analusis, 28: 850-854
[8] M. Hoenig, H. Baeten, S. Vanhentenrijk, E. Vassileva, Ph. Quevauviller, “Critical discussion on the need for an efficient mineralization procedure for the analysis of plant material by atomic spectrometric methods”, Analytica Chemica Acta, 358, 85-94, 1998.
[9] P. Zaprjanova, V. Angelova and K. Ivanov, Correlation between soil characteristics and copper and zinc content in the boveground biomas of Virginia tobacco, Journal of International Scientific Publications, Ecology and Safety, Vol.4, Part.2, 180-187, 2010.
[10] P. Zaprjanova, L. Dospatliev, V. Angelova and K. Ivanov, A Comparative Study of the Methods for Preparation of Soil Samples for Analysis, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (2006), 375-385
[11] ISO 11466. 1995. Soil quality-extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia.
[12] EPA Method. 1996. Mikrowave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludge, soils.
[13] BDS ISO 14869-1.2002. Quality of the soils. Mineralization for the determining the total content of elements.