{"title":"The Application of Line Balancing Technique and Simulation Program to Increase Productivity in Hard Disk Drive Components","authors":"Alonggot Limcharoen, Jintana Wannarat, Vorawat Panich","volume":129,"journal":"International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering","pagesStart":1074,"pagesEnd":1079,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10007993","abstract":"
This study aims to investigate the balancing of the number of operators (Line Balancing technique) in the production line of hard disk drive components in order to increase efficiency. At present, the trend of using hard disk drives has continuously declined leading to limits in a company’s revenue potential. It is important to improve and develop the production process to create market share and to have the ability to compete with competitors with a higher value and quality. Therefore, an effective tool is needed to support such matters. In this research, the Arena program was applied to analyze the results both before and after the improvement. Finally, the precedent was used before proceeding with the real process. There were 14 work stations with 35 operators altogether in the RA production process where this study was conducted. In the actual process, the average production time was 84.03 seconds per product piece (by timing 30 times in each work station) along with a rating assessment by implementing the Westinghouse principles. This process showed that the rating was 123% underlying an assumption of 5% allowance time. Consequently, the standard time was 108.53 seconds per piece. The Takt time was calculated from customer needs divided by working duration in one day; 3.66 seconds per piece. Of these, the proper number of operators was 30 people. That meant five operators should be eliminated in order to increase the production process. After that, a production model was created from the actual process by using the Arena program to confirm model reliability; the outputs from imitation were compared with the original (actual process) and this comparison indicated that the same output meaning was reliable. Then, worker numbers and their job responsibilities were remodeled into the Arena program. Lastly, the efficiency of production process enhanced from 70.82% to 82.63% according to the target.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tThai electronics export in '2015, Thunhoon Newspaper, December 22, 2015\r\n[2]\tS. V Pandit, S. J Kadam, A. Kharat and C. U Nayakawade, \u201cProductivity Improvement by Application of Line Balancing,\u201d International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp: 11495 \u2013 11502, April 2014.\r\n[3]\tA. Jaggi, S. Patra and D. S. Chaubey, \u201cApplication of Line-balancing to Minimize the Idle Time of Workstations in the Production Line with Special Reference to Automobile Industry,\u201d International Journal of IT, Engineering and Applied Sciences Research (IJIEASR), vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 8-12, July 2015\r\n[4]\tBarnes, R., Motion and Time Study Design and Measurement of Work (7th ed.) (Book style). United States: John Wiley & Sons. Inc., 1980.\r\n[5]\tA.P. Puvanasvaran, C.Z. Mei, V.A. Alagendran, \u201cOverall Equipment Efficiency Improvement Using Time Study in an Aerospace Industry,\u201d in Procedia Engineering, vol. 68, pp. 271 \u2013 277, 2013.\r\n[6]\tC. Durana, A. Cetindereb and Y. Emre Aksuc, \u201cProductivity Improvement by Work and Time Study Technique for Earth Energy-glass Manufacturing Company (Published Conference Proceedings style),\u201d in the 4th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, WCBEM, Procidia Economics and Finance, vol.26, pp: 109 \u2013 113, 2015.\r\n[7]\tP. A. Farrington, H. B. Nembhard, D. T. Sturrock, and G. W. Evans, \u201cSimulation As A Tool for Continuous Process Improvement (Published Conference Proceedings style),\u201d in the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 766-773.\r\n[8]\tWajanawichakon and Srimitee, \u201cECRS\u2019s Principles for a Drinking Water Production Plant,\u201d IOSR Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, pp: 956-960, May. 2012.\r\n[9]\tSindhuja. D, Mohandas Gandhi. N, Madhumathi. P, \u201cRedesigning of Horn Assembly Line Using Ecrs Principles,\u201d International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), vol. 1, no. 3, pp: 214 \u2013 217, March 2012.\r\n[10]\tP. Ongkunaruk and W. Wongsatit, \"An ECRS-based line balancing concept: a case study of a frozen chicken producer\", Business Process Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 678 \u2013 692, 2014.\r\n[11]\tC. Kasemset, C. Boonmee and P. Khuntaporn, \u201cApplication of MFCA and ECRS in Waste Reduction: A Case Study of Electronic Parts Factory (Published Conference Proceedings style),\u201d in the 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 1844 - 1853, March 8-10, 2016.\r\n[12]\t\tBanks, J., Carson, J., Nelson, B. L. and Nicol, D., Discrete-Event System Simulation (Book Stlye), 4e, Prentice Hall, 2004.\r\n[13]\tA. Trakultongchai, S. Supsomboon, and K. Limtanyakul, \u201cProcess Simulation and Improvement of Automotive Paint Shop,\u201d International Journal of Mining, Metallurgy & Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME), vol. 1, no. 1, ISSN 2320\u20134060 (Online), 2013.\r\n[14]\tKasemset, Pinmanee and Umarin, \u201cApplication of ECRS and Simulation Techniques in Bottleneck Identification and Improvement: A Paper Package Factory (Published Conference Proceedings style),\u201d in The Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, pp. 1477 \u2013 1484, 2014.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 129, 2017"}