Adjustment and Scale-Up Strategy of Pilot Liquid Fermentation Process of Azotobacter sp.
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Adjustment and Scale-Up Strategy of Pilot Liquid Fermentation Process of Azotobacter sp.

Authors: G. Quiroga-Cubides, A. Díaz, M. Gómez

Abstract:

The genus Azotobacter has been widely used as bio-fertilizer due to its significant effects on the stimulation and promotion of plant growth in various agricultural species of commercial interest. In order to obtain significantly viable cellular concentration, a scale-up strategy for a liquid fermentation process (SmF) with two strains of A. chroococcum (named Ac1 and Ac10) was validated and adjusted at laboratory and pilot scale. A batch fermentation process under previously defined conditions was carried out on a biorreactor Infors®, model Minifors of 3.5 L, which served as a baseline for this research. For the purpose of increasing process efficiency, the effect of the reduction of stirring speed was evaluated in combination with a fed-batch-type fermentation laboratory scale. To reproduce the efficiency parameters obtained, a scale-up strategy with geometric and fluid dynamic behavior similarities was evaluated. According to the analysis of variance, this scale-up strategy did not have significant effect on cellular concentration and in laboratory and pilot fermentations (Tukey, p > 0.05). Regarding air consumption, fermentation process at pilot scale showed a reduction of 23% versus the baseline. The percentage of reduction related to energy consumption reduction under laboratory and pilot scale conditions was 96.9% compared with baseline.

Keywords: Azotobacter chroococcum, scale-up, liquid fermentation, fed-batch process.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130353

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1260

References:


[1] C. Ervin, D. Ervin, “Factors Affecting the use of soil conservation practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy Implications,” Land Economics, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 272-292, Aug. 1982.
[2] E. Lutz, S. Pagiola, C. Reiche, “The costs and benefits of soil conservation: The farmer´s Viewpoint,” The Word Bank Research Observer, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 273-295, July, 1994.
[3] M. Yussefi, H. Willer, “Organic Farming Worldwide 2007: Overview and main statistics,” in The world of organic agriculture, Bonn: IFOAM & FiBL, 2007, pp. 9-22.
[4] C. Cruz, L. Barrero, F. Rodríguez, “Analysis of bioprospecting processes in Colombia,” in Bioprospecting for the development of the agricultural sector of Colombia, Mosquera, 2012, pp. 21-30.
[5] M. Camelo, “Technological development of a biofertilizer based on the diazotrophic bacterium Azotobacter chroococcum,” Master’s Thesis, Military University Nueva Granada, Bogotá, 2010, pp. 8-13.
[6] N. Mrkovacki, V. Millic, “Use of Azotobacter chrocooccum as potentially useful in agricultural applications,” Annals of Microbiol., vol. 51, pp. 145-158, 2001
[7] M. Brown, “Role of Azotobacter paspaliin Association with Paspalum notatum,” J. Applied Bacteriol., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 341-348, June 1976
[8] A. Moreno-Galván, D. Rojas, R. Bonilla, “Sequential statistical design application in identification of Azotobacter chroococcum AC1 nutritional sources,” J. CORPOICA - Agricultural Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 151-158, Nov. 2011
[9] A. Lara, L. Palomares, O. Ramírez, “Bioreactor scale up,” in Encyclopedia of cell Technol., 2000, pp. 1-22
[10] J. Martinko, M. T. Madigan, K. S. Bender, D. H. Buckley, D. A. Stahl, T. Brock, Brock: biology of microorganisms, Madrid: Pearson, 12th edition, 2009.
[11] J. Chimero, “Estudio sobre la depuración de los lixiviados de RSU con cenizas volátiles zeolitizadas,” Master’s Thesis, 2006.
[12] G. L. Turner, A. H. Gibson, “Measurement of nitrogen fixation by indirect means,” in Methods for Evaluating Biological Nitrogen Fixation, Wiley, Ed., Chichester, 1980. pp. 111–139.
[13] A. Díaz-Barrera, A. Aguirre, J. Berrios, F. Acevedo, “Continuous cultures for alginate production by Azotobacter vinelandii growing at different oxygen uptaken rates,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1879-1883, June 2011.
[14] C. Then, Z. Othman, W. Mustapha, M. Sarmidi, R. Aziz, H. El Enshasy, “Production of alginate by Azotobacter vinelandii in semi-industrial scale using batch and fed-batch cultivations systems,” J. of Adv. Scien. Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 45-50, Jan. 2012.
[15] M. Doyle, L. R. Beuchat, T. J. Montville, Microbiología de los alimentos. Fundamentos y fronteras, 2ª ed., España: Acribia Ed., 2001, pp. 773-785.
[16] R. M. Maier, I. L. Pepper, C. P. Gerba, “Bacterial Growth,” in Environmental Microbiology, 3rd ed., San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc, 2009, pp. 40.
[17] R. Perry, Handbook of Chemical Engineering, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Ed., 2001.
[18] P. Harriott, “Nonideal Flow” in Chemical Reactor Design. 1st ed. New York: CRC Press Ed., 2003, pp. 231-262.
[19] A. Anaya, H. Pedroza, “Scale-up, the art of chemical engineering: Pilot plants the passage between the egg and the hen,” Technology, Science, Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31-39, 2008.
[20] C. Hewitt, A. Nienow, “The scaleup of microbial in batch and fedbatch fermentation processes,” Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol. 62, pp. 105-135, 2007.
[21] F. Schmidt, “Optimization and scale up of industrial fermentation processes,” Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 425-435, Oct. 2005.
[22] F. Clementi, “Alginate production by Azotobacter vinelandii”, Crit. Reviews in Biotechnol., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 327-361, 1997.
[23] M. Mejía, D. Segura, G. Espín, E. Galindo and C. Peña, “Two-stage fermentation process for alginate production by Azotobacter vinelandii mutant altered in poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) synthesis”, J. of Applied Microbiol, vol. 108, pp. 55-61, April 2009.
[24] O. Damir, M. Pavlecic, B. Santek, S. Novak, “Cultivation of the bacterium Azotobacter chroococcum for preparation of biofertilizers,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 3104-3111, April 2011.
[25] C. Pozo, M. Martínez-Toledo, B. Rodelas, J. González-López, “Effects of culture conditions on the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by Azotobacter chroococcum H23 in media containing a high concentration of alpechin as primary carbon source,” J. of Biotechol., vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 125-131, 2002.
[26] C. Reyes, C. Peña, E. Galindo, “Reproducing shake flask performance in stirred fermentors: production of alginates by Azotobacter vinelandii,” J. of Biotechol., vol. 105, no. 1-2, pp. 189-198, Nov. 2003.
[27] C. Peña, M. Millán, E. Galindo, “Production of alginate by Azotobacter vinelandii in a stirred fermentor simulating the evolution of power input observed in shake flasks,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 43, pp. 775-778, July 2008.
[28] B. Juárez, J. Martínez-Toledo, J. González-López, “Growth of Azotobacter chroococcum in chemically defined media containing p-hydroxybenzoic acid and protocatechuic acid,” Chemosphere, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 136-1365, Dec. 2001.
[29] R. Quintero, Biochemical Engineering. Theory and applications, Mexico: Ediciones Alhambra Mexicana, 1981.
[30] L. Maranga, A. Cunha, J. Clemente, P. Cruz, M. Carrondo, “Scale‐up of virus‐like particles production: effects of sparging, agitation and bioreactor scale on cell growth, infection kinetics and productivity,” J Biotechnol, vol. 107, no. 1 pp. 55‐64, Jan. 2004.