Parameters of Main Stage of Discharge between Artificial Charged Aerosol Cloud and Ground in Presence of Model Hydrometeor Arrays
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Parameters of Main Stage of Discharge between Artificial Charged Aerosol Cloud and Ground in Presence of Model Hydrometeor Arrays

Authors: D. S. Zhuravkova, A. G. Temnikov, O. S. Belova, L. L. Chernensky, T. K. Gerastenok, I. Y. Kalugina, N. Y. Lysov, A.V. Orlov

Abstract:

Investigation of the discharges from the artificial charged water aerosol clouds in presence of the arrays of the model hydrometeors could help to receive the new data about the peculiarities of the return stroke formation between the thundercloud and the ground when the large volumes of the hail particles participate in the lightning discharge initiation and propagation stimulation. Artificial charged water aerosol clouds of the negative or positive polarity with the potential up to one million volts have been used. Hail has been simulated by the group of the conductive model hydrometeors of the different form. Parameters of the impulse current of the main stage of the discharge between the artificial positively and negatively charged water aerosol clouds and the ground in presence of the model hydrometeors array and of its corresponding electromagnetic radiation have been determined. It was established that the parameters of the array of the model hydrometeors influence on the parameters of the main stage of the discharge between the artificial thundercloud cell and the ground. The maximal values of the main stage current impulse parameters and the electromagnetic radiation registered by the plate antennas have been found for the array of the model hydrometeors of the cylinder revolution form for the negatively charged aerosol cloud and for the array of the hydrometeors of the plate rhombus form for the positively charged aerosol cloud, correspondingly. It was found that parameters of the main stage of the discharge between the artificial charged water aerosol cloud and the ground in presence of the model hydrometeor array of the different considered forms depend on the polarity of the artificial charged aerosol cloud. In average, for all forms of the investigated model hydrometeors arrays, the values of the amplitude and the current rise of the main stage impulse current and the amplitude of the corresponding electromagnetic radiation for the artificial charged aerosol cloud of the positive polarity were in 1.1-1.9 times higher than for the charged aerosol cloud of the negative polarity. Thus, the received results could indicate to the possible more important role of the big volumes of the large hail arrays in the thundercloud on the parameters of the return stroke for the positive lightning.

Keywords: Main stage of discharge, hydrometeor form, lightning parameters, negative and positive artificial charged aerosol cloud.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130071

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 977

References:


[1] V. A. Rakov, M. A. Uman, Lightning: physics and effects. Cambridge University Press, Boca Raton, 2003.
[2] V. A. Rakov, F. Rachidi, “Overview of recent progress in lightning research and lightning protection,” IEEE Transact. On Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 428-442, 2009.
[3] J. R. Dwyer, V. A. Uman, “The physics of lightning,” Phys. Rep., vol. 534, pp. 147-241, 2014.
[4] Lightning Parameters for Engineering Applications. TB 549, CIGRE, Working Group C4.407, 2013, 118 p.
[5] M. Stolzenburg, T. C. Marshall, “Charge structure and dynamics in thunderstorms,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 137, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s112214-008-9338-z.
[6] F. G. Zoghzoghy, M. B. Cohen, R. K. Said, S. S. Basilico, R. J. Blakeslee, and U. S. Inan, “Lightning activity following the return stroke,” J. of Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres, 2014, doi: 10.1002/2014JD021738.
[7] N. Pineda, T. Rigo, J. Montanyà, O. A. van der Velde, “Charge structure analysis of a severe hailstorm with predominantly positive cloud-to-ground lightning,” Atmos. Res., vol. 178–179, pp. 31–44, 2016.
[8] V. A. Rakov, “Comparison of positive and negative lightning”, in 1998 Intern. Lightning Detection Conference, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
[9] Lightning: Principles, Instruments and Applications. Review of Modern Lightning Research. Eds.: H.D. Betz, U. Schumann, P. Laroche. Springer, 2009.
[10] V. A. Rakov, “Electromagnetic Methods of Lightning Detection,” Surveys in Geophysics (Springer), vol. 34, no. 4, 2013, DOI 10.1007/s10712-013-9251-1.
[11] A. Nag, M. J. Murphy, W. Schulz, K. L. Cummins, “Lightning location systems: Insights on characteristics and validation technique,” Earth and Space Science, AGU Publications, vol. 2, 2015, DOI: 10.1002/2014EA000051.
[12] A. G. Temnikov, A. V. Orlov, V. N. Bolotov, Y. V. Tkach, "Studies of the parameters of a spark discharge between an artificial charged water-aerosol cloud and the ground," Tech. Phys., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 868-875, 2005.
[13] A. G. Temnikov, “Using of artificial clouds of charged water aerosol for investigations of physics of lightning and lightning protection,” IEEE Conference Publications: Lightning Protection (ICLP), 2012 International Conference on, 6344279, 2012.
[14] “Lightning and Insulator Subcommittee of the T&D Committee. Parameters of Lightning Strokes: A Review”, IEEE transactions on power delivery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 346-358, 2005.
[15] E. M. Bazelyan, Y. P. Raizer, Lightning Physics and Lightning Protection. IoP Publishing, Bristol and New York, 2000.
[16] K. L. Cummins and M. J. Murphy, “An overview of lightning locating systems: History, techniques, and uses, with an in techniques, and uses, with an in techniques, and uses, with an in techniques, and uses, with an in -depth look at the U.S. NLDN,” Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 51, no. 3, pp 499-518, 2009.