Composite Distributed Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Considering Security
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Composite Distributed Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Considering Security

Authors: Amir Lotfi, Seyed Hamid Hosseini

Abstract:

During the recent past, due to the increase of electrical energy demand and governmental resources constraints in creating additional capacity in the generation, transmission, and distribution, privatization, and restructuring in electrical industry have been considered. So, in most of the countries, different parts of electrical industry like generation, transmission, and distribution have been separated in order to create competition. Considering these changes, environmental issues, energy growth, investment of private equity in energy generation units and difficulties of transmission lines expansion, distributed generation (DG) units have been used in power systems. Moreover, reduction in the need for transmission and distribution, the increase of reliability, improvement of power quality, and reduction of power loss have caused DG to be placed in power systems. On the other hand, considering low liquidity need, private investors tend to spend their money for DGs. In this project, the main goal is to offer an algorithm for planning and placing DGs in order to reduce the need for transmission and distribution network.

Keywords: Planning, transmission, distributed generation, power security, power systems.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340162

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1066

References:


[1] Ahmad Rouhani, Seyyed Hadi Hosseini, Mahdi Raoofat, “Composite generation and transmission expansion considering distributed generation”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Volume 62, November 2014, Pages 792–805
[2] H. Lee Willis and Walter G. Scott, Distributed Power Generation: Planning and Evaluation, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2000
[3] G. Latorre, R.D. Cruz, J.M. Areiza, A. Villegas, “Classification and Publications and Models on Transmission Expansion Planning,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 18, pp. 938 – 946, May 2003.
[4] Richard E. Brown (SM), Jiuping Pan (M), Xiaoming Feng (M) and Krassimir Koutlev (M), “Siting Distributed Generation to Defer T&D Expansion” Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, Nov. 2001
[5] Paul Vasquez, Fernando Olsina, “Valuing Flexibility of DG Investments in Transmission Expansion Planning”, Power Tech conference IEEE Lausanne August 2007 695-700
[6] G. Cler, N. Lenssen and C. Manz, “Residential Distributed Generation: Options and Prospects”, Report DE-6, E Source, 1999.
[7] S.O. Orero, M.R. Irving “A genetic algorithm for generator scheduling in power systems”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Volume 18, Issue 1, January 1996, Pages 19–26
[8] Agalgaonkar AP, Kulkarni SV, Khaparde SA, “Evaluation of configuration plans for DGs in developing countries using advanced planning techniques”, IEEE Trans Power Systems 2006, 973–83
[9] M. Lu, Z. Y. Dong, T.K. Saha, “Transmission Expansion Planning Flexibility,” The 7th International Power Engineering Conf. IPEC, Dec. 2005, pp. 893 – 898.
[10] R. Billinton, R. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, Ed. Plenum Press, New York, 1996
[11] N. Jenkins, R. Allan, P. Crossley, D. Kirschen, G. Strbac, Embedded Generation, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Jan. 00
[12] B. Hobbs, J. Honious, J. Bluestein, “Estimating the Flexibility of Utility Resource Plans: An Application to Natural Gas Cofiring for SO2 Control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Feb. 1994, pp. 167-173.
[13] C. J. Andrews, “Evaluating Risk Management Strategies in Resource Planning,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 10, pp. 420-426, Feb-95.