The Use of Network Theory in Heritage Cities
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
The Use of Network Theory in Heritage Cities

Authors: J. L. Oliver, T. Agryzkov, L. Tortosa, J. Vicent, J. Santacruz

Abstract:

This paper aims to demonstrate how the use of Network Theory can be applied to a very interesting and complex urban situation: The parts of a city which may have some patrimonial value, but because of their lack of relevant architectural elements, they are not considered to be historic in a conventional sense. In this paper, we use the suburb of La Villaflora in the city of Quito, Ecuador as our case study. We first propose a system of indicators as a tool to characterize and quantify the historic value of a geographic area. Then, we apply these indicators to the suburb of La Villaflora and use Network Theory to understand and propose actions.

Keywords: Data visualization, historic value, spatial analysis, urban networks.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339978

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1045

References:


[1] A. Ortiz, Origen, traza, acomodo y crecimiento de la ciudad de Quito. Quito: Trama, 2004.
[2] A. Ortiz, Damero. Quito: Trama, 2007, pp 105-132.
[3] F. Carrión, “La forma urbana de Quito: una historia de centro y periferias” in Bulletin d’Institut Française d’Etudes Andines, vol. 41, Quito, 2012, pp. 503-522
[4] J. Salvador, Historia de Quito. Quito: Fonsal, 2009, pp. 270-290
[5] L. Achig, El proceso urbano de Quito. Quito: Flacso, 1983, pp. 57-72
[6] K. Garcés, La ciudad de Quito y los otros. Quito: Flacso, 2006, pp. 226-234
[7] A. Ortiz, Guía de arquitectura de la ciudad de Quito (TII). Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía, 204, p. 261
[8] L. Moreno, “Urbanización de un barrio obrero Villa Flora”, Tesis de Grado. Quito, UCE, 1946
[9] A. Ponce, La Mariscal. Historia de un barrio moderno en Quito en el siglo XX. Quito: Instituto Metropolitano de Patrimonio, 2011
[10] F. Choay, L’Allégorie du parimoine. Paris: Seuil, 1996
[11] R. de la Hoz, “De Ruskin a Violet-le-Duc”, in III Congreso Internacional de Rehabilitación del patrimonio arquitectónico y edificación, Madrid, 2006
[12] The Venice Charter in IInd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, 1965 was adopted by ICOMOS in 1965
[13] The Charter of Krakow in International Conference on Conservation Krakow 2000, propose the. Principles for Conservartion and restoration of built heritage
[14] J. Gehl, Cities for people. Washington: Island Press, 2010
[15] V. Iborra, “El Proyecto figurative en la ciudad contemporanea”, Ph. Doc. Thesis, Alicante University, 2015
[16] N. Salingaros, “Urban network theory”, Design Science Planning, 2005
[17] T. Agryzkov,; J.L. Oliver, L. Tortosa, J. Vicent, “An algorithm for ranking the nodes of an urban network based on concept of PageRank vector”, Appl. Math. Comput. 219, pp. 2186–2193, 2012
[18] T. Agryzkov; J.L. Oliver, L. Tortosa, J. Vicent, “Analyzing the commercial activities of a street network by ranking their nodes – a case study Murcia”, Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 28 (3), pp. 479–495, 2014