Beef Cattle Farmers Perception toward Urea Mineral Molasses Block
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Beef Cattle Farmers Perception toward Urea Mineral Molasses Block

Authors: Veronica Sri Lestari, Djoni Prawira Rahardja, Tanrigiling Rasyid, Aslina Asnawi, Ikrar Muhammad Saleh, Ilham Rasyid

Abstract:

Urea Mineral Molasses Block is very important for beef cattle, because it can increase beef production. The purpose of this research was to know beef cattle farmers’ perception towards Urea Mineral Molasses Block (UMMB). This research was conducted in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia in 2016. The population of this research were all beef cattle farmers. Sample was chosen through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation and face to face with deep interview using questionnaire. Variables of perception consisted of relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, observability and triability. There were 10 questions. The answer for each question was scored by 1, 2, 3 which refer to disagree, agree enough, strongly agree. The data were analyzed descriptively using frequency distribution. The research revealed that beef cattle farmers’ perception towards UMMB was categorized as strongly agree.

Keywords: Beef cattle, farmers, perception, urea mineral molasses block.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127360

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1865

References:


[1] Rianto, E. and E. Purbowati. Panduan Usaha Penggemukan Sapi Potong. Penebar Swadaya, 2009, Jakarta.
[2] Arifin, B. Social-Economic Dimension and policy perspectives of animal industry. International Symposium on Animal Industry. Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia. September 17-18, 2015.
[3] Rawendra, R. and Sabir. 2016. Gerakan Pemberdayaan Petani Terpadu. Balai Besar Pelatihan Peternakan Batu. Media Nusa Creative. Batu. Malang, East Jawa.
[4] Tekeba E, Wurzinger M and Zollitsch W. 2012: Effects of urea-molasses multi-nutrient blocks as a dietary supplement for dairy cows in two milk production systems in north-western Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #130. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/8/teke24130.htm
[5] Abutani, S. A., S. Rahim dan Noverma. Responpemberian “bloksuplemen” berbasis bahan local terhadap pertambahan bobot badan sapi. Jurnal Sains Peternakan Indonesia, 2010, 5(1): 65-69.
[6] Wahyudi, A. Evaluasipenggunaan urea molasses mineral probiotik blok (UMPB) padasa piper ahlak tasi terhadap produksi dan kwalitas susu. Jurnal Protein, 2006, vol 14 (2): 129-136.
[7] Hossain, K.B., N.R. Sarker., M. Saadulloaj., M.A. H. Beg., T.M. Khan. Effect of feeding straw supplementing with urea molasses block lick on the performance of sheep. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences.1 June 1995, 8(3).pp: 289-293.
[8] Tiwari, S.P.,U.B. Singh, Usha R. Mehra. Urea molasses mineral blocks as a feed supplement: Effect on growth and nutrient utilization in buffalo calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology .Volume 29, Issues 3–4, June 1990, Pages 333-341.
[9] Suharyono, H. Sutanto, Y. Purwanti, Martanti, A. Agus and R. Utomo. The Effect of Urea Molasses Multi-Nutrient and Medicated Block for Beef Cattle, Beef and Dairy Cow. Atom Indonesia, 2014, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp: 77.
[10] Hatungimana, E. and P. Ndolisha. Effect of urea molasses block supplementation on growth performance of sheep. International Journal of Novel Research in Life Science, 2015, 2(3): pp: 38-43. June, ISSN: 2394-966X.
[11] Murniati, T., M. Idrus., D. P. Rahardja., A. L. Toleng., and A. Ako. Effect of Maternal Nutrition at Different Stages of Pregnancy in Goats (Etawa Cross and Kacang) on Performance of Does and Goat Kids. International Journal of Science and Research, September 2015, 4(9): 210-215.
[12] Sansoucy, R., G. Aarts and R.A. Leng. Mollasses-Urea Block as a Multinutrient Supplement for Ruminants. FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/s8850e/S8850E24.htm. Retrieved: 10 September 2016.
[13] Misra, A.K., Subba Reddy G and Ramakrishna Y. Participation on-farm evaluation of urea molasses mineral block as a supplement to crossbred cows for dry season feeding in rain-fed agro-ecosystem of India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2006, Vol 18, article # 24. Retrieved August 20 2016.http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/2/misr18024.htm.
[14] De Amitendu, D., A. Goswarni. and D. Masumder. Adoption behavior of livestock farmers in Paschin Medinipore District of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. ISSN: 2319-7706. 3(8), 2014,pp: 666-672.
[15] Abdullah, A. andC.I.Sutrisno. Farmers’ Perception of using straw fermentation technology for beef cattle feed in Bulukumba, South Sulawesi. Proceedings of the 3 International Conference on Sustainable Animal Agriculture for Developing Countries. Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, 26-29 July, 2011.http://inaabdullah.blogspot.com/ Retrieved August 20, 2016.
[16] Habib, G. 2004. Mulberry-fruit-based feed blocks: A key supplement for livestock in Mountainous Regions. Mountain Research and Development. 2004. 24(2):106-109.
[17] Sharma, M., G. Singh and B. S. Krishi. Urea molasses mineral block-A technology to increase milk production in dairy animals. Vigyan Kendra, Kapurthala Directorate of Extension Education Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana-141001. https://id.scribd.com/doc/38219071/UMMB-Technical-Bulletin-for-Students-Farmers-and-Extension-Workers-for-Use-in-Dairy-Cattle-Production. Retrieved 21 August 2016.
[18] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016. Sulawesi Selatan dalam Angka. Makassar Sulawesi Selatan.
[19] Yusuf, D. 2010. UMN (Urea Molases Block) Permen Jilat Ternak. http://www.lembahgogoniti.com/artikel/29/71.html. Retrieved: 21 August 2016.
[20] Rogers, E, M. 2003. Diffusions of Innovations; Fifth Edition. Simon& Schuster Publisher.
[21] Riduwan and Akdon. 2009. Rumus dan Data dalam Analisis Statistika. Alfabeta, Bandung.