The Influence of Architectural-Planning Structure of Cities on Their Sustainable Development
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32769
The Influence of Architectural-Planning Structure of Cities on Their Sustainable Development

Authors: M. Kashiripoor

Abstract:

Existing indicators for sustainable urban development do not identify the features of cities’ planning structures and their architecture. Iranian city has special relevance problem of assessing the conformity of their planning and development of the concept of sustainable development. Based on theoretical sources, the author concludes that, despite the existence of common indicators for sustainable development of settlements, specialized evaluation criteria city structure planning has not been developed. He is trying to fill this gap and put forward a system of indicators characterizing the level of development of the architectural-planning structure of the city. The proposed system of indicators is designed based on technical and economic urban standard indicators from different countries. Alternative designing systems and requirements of modern rating systems like LEED-ND comprise a criterion for evaluation of urban structures in accordance with principles of "Green" building and New Urbanism. Urban development trends are close in spirit of sustainable development and developed under its influence. The study allowed concluding that a system of indicators to identify the relevant architectural-planning structure of the city, requirements of sustainable development, should be adapted to the conditions of each country, particularly in Iran. The article attempts typology proposed indicators, which are presented in tabular form and are divided into two types: planning and spatial. This article discusses the known indicators of sustainable development and proposed specific system of indicators characterizing the level of development of architectural-planning structure of the city. This article examines indicators for evaluating level of city' planning structure development. The proposed system of indicators is derived from the urban planning standards and rating systems such as LEED-ND, BREEAM Community and CASBEE-UD.

Keywords: Architectural-planning structure of cities, urban planning indicators, urban space indicators.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123995

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1042

References:


[1] International Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, UN, 1987, p.300.
[2] G.A. Potaev, I.A. Eodo, Urbanism and territorial planning. Russian Federation: Phoenix, 2008, p. 286.
[3] I. N. Yakovlev, Regularities of trends and mechanisms for sustainable development of urban structures highly urbanized objects of the Russian Federation, Thesis for the degree of Postdoctoral of Architecture, Samara State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2010, p. 345.
[4] A.N. Tetior, Sustainable urban design. Moscow Government – Russia, Ministry of Science, 1999, p.195.
[5] N.P. Tarasova, E.B. Kruchina Index and indicators of sustainable development, Sustainable Development: Nature - Society – Human, pp.127-144.
[6] A.U. Scrigan, “The experience of forming a system of indicators for sustainable urban development,” Pskov logical region journal: vol. 9, Russia, 2010, pp. 100–109.
[7] J. Coplák., P. Rakšányi, Planning Sustainable Settlements, Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia: Bratislava, 2003, p. 111.
[8] Criterion planners, “A Global Survey of Urban Sustainability Rating Tools,” USA, Oregon, Portland, 2014, p. 28.
[9] A.J. Lynch, S. Andreason and others, Sustainable urban development indicators for the United States, PA: Philadelphia, 2011, p.62.
[10] Congress for the New Urbanism, Natural Resources Defense Council, U.S. Green Building Council, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), 2009 for Neighborhood Development Rating System, Updated October 2013, p. 41-107.
[11] Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology. BREEAM Communities technical manual: version: SD202 – 1.0:2012, UK, 2014, p. 177.
[12] Kh. KashaniJou, I. Fathololoomi, “Investigating Sustainable Neighborhood Development in Jahanshahr,” International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering, vol.8, no. 9, 2014, pp. 2803-2811.
[13] Japan Sustainable Building Consortium. CASBEE-City, Technical Manual, Japan Sustainable Building Consortium, The committee for the development of an environmental performance assessment tools for cities, Japan, 2012, p. 63.
[14] A. Sharifi, A. Murayama, “Viability of using global standards for neighbourhood sustainability assessment: insights from a comparative case study,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2015, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2014, pp.1–23.
[15] A. Sharifi, A. Murayama, “Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: A case study of Iranian cities,” Journal Habitat International, 2013, pp. 126-134.
[16] P. Pinnell, Smart-code, The Center for Applied Transect Studies (CATS), p.72.
[17] Kh. Kashani Jou, I. Fathololoomi, “Investigating Sustainable Neighborhood Development in Jahanshahr,” International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering, vol.8, no. 9, 2014, pp. 2803-2811.