Analytical Slope Stability Analysis Based on the Statistical Characterization of Soil Shear Strength
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Analytical Slope Stability Analysis Based on the Statistical Characterization of Soil Shear Strength

Authors: Bernardo C. P. Albuquerque, Darym J. F. Campos

Abstract:

Increasing our ability to solve complex engineering problems is directly related to the processing capacity of computers. By means of such equipments, one is able to fast and accurately run numerical algorithms. Besides the increasing interest in numerical simulations, probabilistic approaches are also of great importance. This way, statistical tools have shown their relevance to the modelling of practical engineering problems. In general, statistical approaches to such problems consider that the random variables involved follow a normal distribution. This assumption tends to provide incorrect results when skew data is present since normal distributions are symmetric about their means. Thus, in order to visualize and quantify this aspect, 9 statistical distributions (symmetric and skew) have been considered to model a hypothetical slope stability problem. The data modeled is the friction angle of a superficial soil in Brasilia, Brazil. Despite the apparent universality, the normal distribution did not qualify as the best fit. In the present effort, data obtained in consolidated-drained triaxial tests and saturated direct shear tests have been modeled and used to analytically derive the probability density function (PDF) of the safety factor of a hypothetical slope based on Mohr-Coulomb rupture criterion. Therefore, based on this analysis, it is possible to explicitly derive the failure probability considering the friction angle as a random variable. Furthermore, it is possible to compare the stability analysis when the friction angle is modelled as a Dagum distribution (distribution that presented the best fit to the histogram) and as a Normal distribution. This comparison leads to relevant differences when analyzed in light of the risk management.

Keywords: Statistical slope stability analysis, Skew distributions, Probability of failure, Functions of random variables.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111636

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1490

References:


[1] Anderson, T. W., and Darling, D. A. (1954). “A test of goodness-of-fit.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 49(268), 765–769.
[2] Cai, F., and Ugai, K. (2004). “Numerical analysis of rainfall effects on slope stability.” Int. J. Geomech., 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004) 4:2(69), 69–78.
[3] Cardoso, F.B.F. (2002). Propriedades e Comportamento Mecânico de Solos do Planalto Central Brasileiro. Tese de Doutorado, Publicação G.TD-009A/02, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, 357p.
[4] Castro, B. C. (2011). Modelo Geomecânico para os Principais Solos de Brasília. Dissertação de Mestrado, Publicação G.DM-202/11, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, 179p.
[5] Chalermyanont, T., and Benson, C. (2005). “Reliability-based design for external stability of mechanically stabilized earth walls.” Int. J. Geomech., 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:3(196), 196–205.
[6] D’Agostino, R. B., and Stephens, M. A. (1986). Goodness-of-fit techniques, Marcel Dekker, New York.
[7] Duncan, J. M. (2000). “Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241 (2000)126:4(307), 307–316.
[8] Genevois, R., and Romeo, R. W. (2003). “Probability of failure occurrence and recurrence in rock slopes stability analysis.” Int. J. Geomech., 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2003)3:1(34), 34–42.
[9] Guimarães, R. C. (2002). Análise das Propriedades e Comportamento de um Perfil de Solo Laterítico Aplicada ao Estudo do Desempenho de Estacas Escavadas. Dissertação de Mestrado, Publicação G.DM-090A/02, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, 183p.
[10] Kleiber, C. (2008). “A guide to the Dagum distributions.” Chapter 6, Modeling income distributions and Lorenz curves (economic studies in inequality, social exclusion and well-being), D. Chotikapanich, ed., Springer, New York.
[11] Liu, D.-S., and Zheng, Y. (1997). “A probabilistic yield criterion of geomaterials (C).” Proc., Int. Symp. on Rock Mechanics and Environmental Geotechnology, J. Sun, ed., Chongqing University Press, Chongqing, China, 377–382.
[12] Mathematica 9. Champaign, IL, Wolfram Research.
[13] Nomikos, P. P., and Sofianos, A. I. (2011). “An analytical probability distribution for the factor of safety in underground rock mechanics.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 48(4), 597–605.
[14] Silva, F., Lambe, T. W., and Marr, W. A. (2008). “Probability and risk of slope failure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)1090- 0241(2008)134:12(1691), 1691–1699.
[15] Sivakumar Babu, G. L., and Singh, V. P. (2011). “Reliability-based load and resistance factors for soil-nail walls.” Can. Geotech. J., 48(6), 915–930.
[16] Wang, Y., Au, S., and Kulhawy, F. (2011). “Expanded reliability-based design approach for drilled shafts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000421, 140–149.
[17] Whitman, R. V. (1984). “Evaluating calculated risk in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 110(6), 143–188.
[18] Zhang, L., Liu, D.-S., Song, Q.-H., and Liu, S.-W. (2008). “An analytical expression of reliability solution for Druker-Prager criterion.” Appl. Math. Mech. (Engl. Ed.), 29(1), 121–128.