An Antibacterial Dental Restorative Containing 3,4-Dichlorocrotonolactone: Synthesis, Formulation and Evaluation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
An Antibacterial Dental Restorative Containing 3,4-Dichlorocrotonolactone: Synthesis, Formulation and Evaluation

Authors: Dong Xie, Leah Howard, Yiming Weng

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to synthesize and characterize 5-acryloyloxy-3,4-dichlorocrotonolactone (a furanone derivative), use this derivative to modify a dental restorative, and study the effect of the derivative on the antibacterial activity and compressive strength of the formed restorative. In this study, a furanone derivative was synthesized, characterized, and used to formulate a dental restorative. Compressive strength (CS) and S. mutans viability were used to evaluate the mechanical strength and antibacterial activity of the formed restorative. The fabricated restorative specimens were photocured and conditioned in distilled water at 37oC for 24 h, followed by direct testing for CS or/and incubating with S. mutans for 48 h for antibacterial testing. The results show that the modified dental restorative showed a significant antibacterial activity without substantially decreasing the mechanical strengths. With addition of the antibacterial derivative up to 30%, the restorative kept its original CS nearly unchanged but showed a significant antibacterial activity with 68% reduction in the S. mutans viability. Furthermore, the antibacterial function of the modified restorative was not affected by human saliva. The aging study also indicates that the modified restorative may have a long-lasting antibacterial function. It is concluded that this experimental antibacterial restorative may potentially be developed into a clinically attractive dental filling restorative due to its high mechanical strength and antibacterial function.

Keywords: Antibacterial, dental filling restorative, compressive strength, S. mutans viability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111610

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1894

References:


[1] Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 25-28.
[2] Forss H, Widstrom E. Reasons for restorative therapy and longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 82-86.
[3] Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 303-39.
[4] Deligeorgi V, Mjor IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8: 5-11.
[5] Craig RG, Power JM. Restorative Dental Materials, 11th edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 2002; 614-618.
[6] Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials - Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 343–362.
[7] Osinaga PW, Grande RH, Ballester RY, Simionato MR, Delgado Rodrigues CR, Muench A. Zinc sulfate addition to glass-ionomer-based cements: influence on physical and antibacterial properties, zinc and fluoride release. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 212-217.
[8] Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 467-452.
[9] Yamamoto K, Ohashi S, Aono M, Kokubo T, Yamada I, Yamauchi J. Antibacterial activity of silver ions implanted in SiO2 filler on oral streptococci. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 227-229.
[10] Syafiuddin T, Hisamitsu H, Toko T, Igarashi T, Goto N, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T. In vitro inhibition of caries around a resin composite restoration containing antibacterial filler. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 1051-1057.
[11] Gottenbos B, van der Mei HC, Klatter F, Nieuwenhuis P, Busscher HJ. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of covalently coupled quaternary ammonium silane coatings on silicone rubber. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1417-1423.
[12] Thebault P, Taffin de Givenchy E, Levy R, Vandenberghe Y, Guittard F, Geribaldi S. Preparation and antimicrobial behavior of quaternary ammonium thiol derivatives able to be grafted on metal surfaces. Eur J Med Chem 2009; 44: 717-724.
[13] Imazato S, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Antibacterial activity of MDPB polymer incorporated in dental resin. J Dent 1995; 23: 177-181.
[14] Murata H. Permanent, non-leaching antibacterial surfaces—2: How high density cationic surfaces kill bacterial cells. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4870-4879.
[15] Guiqian Lu, Dingcai Wu, Ruowen Fu. Studies on the synthesis and antibacterial activities of polymeric quaternary ammonium salts from dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate. React & Funct Polym 2007; 67: 355–366.
[16] Lee SB, Koepsel RR, Morley SW, Matyjaszewski K, Sun Y, Russell AJ. Permanent, nonleaching antibacterial surfaces. 1. Synthesis by atom transfer radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5: 877-882.
[17] Li F, Chai ZG, Sun MN, Wang F, Ma S, Zhang L, Fang M, Chen JH. Anti-biofilm effect of dental adhesive with cationic monomer. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 372-376.
[18] Li F, Chen J, Chai Z, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Fang M, Ma S. Effects of a dental adhesive incorporating antibacterial monomer on the growth, adherence and membrane integrity of Streptococcus mutans. J Dent 2009; 37: 289-296.
[19] Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3995-4002.
[20] Weng Y, Guo X, Chong VJ, Howard L, Gregory RL, Xie D. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel antibacterial dental resin composite with quaternary ammonium salts. J Biomater Sci Eng 2011; 4:147-157.
[21] Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RRB. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3605-3609.
[22] Ebi N, Imazato S, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. Inhibitory effects of resin composite containing bactericide-immobilized filler on plaque accumulation. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 485-491.
[23] Jung JH, Pummangura S, Chaichantipyuth C, Patarapanich C, Fanwick PE, Chang CJ, Mclaughlin JL. New bioactive heptenes from melodorum fruticosum (annonaceae). Tetrahedron 1990; 46:5043-5054.
[24] Jones JB, Young JM. Carcinogenicity of lactones III: The reactions of unsaturated 4-lactones with l-cysteine. J Med Chem 1968; 11: 1176.
[25] Xie D., Weng, Y., Guo, X., Zhao, J., Gregory, R.L., Zheng, C. Preparation and evaluation of a novel glass-ionomer cement with antibacterial functions, Dent Mater 2011; 27:487-496.
[26] Lattmann E, Dunn S, Niamsanit S, Sattayasai N. Synthesis and antibacterial activities of 5-hydroxy-4-amino-2(5H)-furanones. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005; 15: 919-921.
[27] Drummond JL. Degradation, Fatigue, and Failure of Resin Dental Composite Materials. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 710-719.