Experimental Model for Instruction of Pre-Service Teachers in ICT Tools and E-learning Environments
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Experimental Model for Instruction of Pre-Service Teachers in ICT Tools and E-learning Environments

Authors: Rachel Baruch

Abstract:

This article describes the implementation of an experimental model for teaching ICT tools and digital environments in teachers training college. In most educational systems in the Western world, new programs were developed in order to bridge the digital gap between teachers and students. In spite of their achievements, these programs are limited due to several factors: The teachers in the schools implement new methods incorporating technological tools into the curriculum, but meanwhile the technology changes and advances. The interface of tools changes frequently, some tools disappear and new ones are invented. These conditions require an experimental model of training the pre-service teachers. The appropriate method for instruction within the domain of ICT tools should be based on exposing the learners to innovations, helping them to gain experience, teaching them how to deal with challenges and difficulties on their own, and training them. This study suggests some principles for this approach and describes step by step the implementation of this model.

Keywords: ICT tools, e-learning, pre-service teachers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338796

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1050

References:


[1] Bennett, S. (2012). Digital natives. In Z. Yan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior: Volume 1 (pp. 212-219). United States: IGI Global.
[2] Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). The Successful Barriers to Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5 (3), 235-245. Retrieved from: http://ejmste.com/v5n3/EURASIA_v5n3_Bingimlas.pdf
[3] Dede, C. (2005). Planning for Neomillennial Learning Styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 7-12. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu
[4] Dresang, E.T. (2005). The Information-Seeking Behavior of Youth in the Digital Environment. Library Trends, 54(2). 178-196.
[5] Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(2). 324–340. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2009.00953
[6] Evans, J.A. & Foster, J.G. (2011). Metaknowledge. Science 11 ( 331). 721-725. DOI: 10.1126/science.1201765
[7] Feuerstein, R., Klein, P.S., Tannenbaum, A.J. (Eds.)(1999). Mediated Learning Experience (MLE): Theoretical, Psychosocial and Learning Implications. Freund Publishing House Ltd.
[8] Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset. Educause Review, 35(5), 14-24. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu
[9] Hare, S., Howard, E. & Pope, M. (2002). Technology Integration: Closing the Gap Between What Pre Service Teachers are Taught To Do and What They Can Do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191-203. Norfolk, VA: SITE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org
[10] Jimoyiannis, A. & Komis, v. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development 11(2). 149-173. DOI: 10.1080/13664530701414779
[11] Kirkwood, A. & Price, L. Adaptation for a Changing Environment: Developing learning and teaching with information and communication technologies. The International Review of Research in pen and Distance Learning 7(2). Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org
[12] Koutropoulos. A. (2011). Digital Natives: Ten Years After. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(4). 525-538. Retrieved from: http://jolt.merlot.org/
[13] Kula, A. (2013) Barriers for ICT Integration, Strategies Developed Against Themand Cases in Turkey. Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Educational Technologies e-Transformation and Internet Section Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu.
[14] Lim, P. C. (2002). A theoretical framework for the study of ICT in schools: a proposal. British Journal of Educational Technology 33( 4). 411–421.
[15] Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9 (5). 1-6.
[16] Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon 9 (6): 1-6. Retrieved from: http://www.twitchspeed.com.
[17] Seely-Brown, J. (2000). Growing Up: Digital: How the Web Chanes Work, Education, and the Ways People Learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning32(2). 11-20.
[18] Slowinski, J. (2000). The Gap Between Preparation and Reality in Training Teachers to Use Technology. Retrieved from: http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=797
[19] Swain, C. & Pearson, T. (2001). Bridging the Digital Divide: A Building Block for Teachers. Learning & Leading with Technology 28(8). 10-59.
[20] Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (Online). Retrieved from: http://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1995/9541/9541.PDF
[21] Wanberg, CR, & Kammeyer-Mueller, JD (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85. 373–385.
[22] Zhao, H., & Seibert, SE (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91. 259–271.