Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30458
Finite Difference Method of the Seismic Analysis of Earth Dam
Abstract:Many embankment dams have suffered failures during earthquakes due to the increase of pore water pressure under seismic loading. After analyzing of the behavior of embankment dams under severe earthquakes, major advances have been attained in the understanding of the seismic action on dams. The present study concerns numerical analysis of the seismic response of earth dams. The procedure uses a nonlinear stress-strain relation incorporated into the code FLAC2D based on the finite difference method. This analysis provides the variation of the pore water pressure and horizontal displacement.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338688Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1884
 Gazetas G. Seismic response of earth dams: some recent developments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1987, 6(1): 2–47.
 USCOLD (US Committee on Large Dams). Observed Performance of Dams during Earthquakes. Committee on Earthquakes, Denver, CO, 1992.
 M. Zeghal, A.M. Abdel-Ghaffar. Local-global finite element analysis of the seismic response of earth dams. Computers and Structures, Vol.42, No.4, pp. 569-579, 1992.
 Ernesto Cascone, Sebastiano Rampello. Decoupled seismic analysis of an earth dam. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 23 (2003) 349–365.
 Clough, R.W. and Chopra, A.K. (1966). Earthquake stress analysis in earth dams. Proc. ASCE, Vol. 92, No. EM2.
 Ghaboussi, J. (1967). Dynamic stress analysis of porous elastic solids saturated with compressible fluids. PhD Thesis University of California, Berkeley.
 Schnabel, P.L., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H.B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report No. EERC72-12, University of California, Berkeley.
 Idriss, I.M., Lysmer, J., Hwang, R. and Seed, H.B. (1973). QUAD-4: A computer program for evaluating the seismic response of soil structures by variable damping finite element procedures. Report No. EERC73-16, University of California, Berkeley.
 Martin, G.R., Finn, W.D.L. and Seed, H.B. (1975). Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, 423–438.
 White, W., Valliappan, S. and Lee, I.K. (1979). Finite element mesh constraints for wave propagation problems. Proc. Of the Third International Conference in Australia on Finite Element Methods. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 531–539.
 Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Shiomi, T. (1984). Dynamic behaviour of saturated porous media: the generalized biot formulation and its numerical solution. Int. J. Num. And Anal. Meth. In Geomech., 8, 71–96.
 Finn, W.D.L., Yogendrakumar, M., Yoshida, N. and Yoshida, H. (1986). TARA-3: a program to compute the response of 2-D embankments and soil-structure interaction systems to seismic loadings. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada.
 Medina, F., Domingues, J. and Tasoulas, J.L. (1990). Response of dams to earthquakes including effects of sediments. Jour. of Struc. Engng Div., ASCE, 101, 423–438.
 Li, X.S., Wang, Z.L. and Shen, C.K. (1992). SUMDES, a nonlinear procedure for response analysis of horizontally-layered sites subjected to multi-directional earthquake loading. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis.
 Kuhlemeyer RL and J Lysmer. (1973). Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems. J.Soil Mech. & Foundations, Div. ASCE 99(SM5), 421-427.
 ITASCA 2005. Consulting Group, Inc. FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua). Version 5. Minneapolis, MN, USA.