Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30465
Impact of Reproductive Technologies on Women’s Lives in New Delhi: A Study from Feminist Perspective

Authors: Zairunisha

Abstract:

This paper is concerned with the ways in which Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) affect women’s lives and perceptions regarding their infertility, contraception and reproductive health. The paper is based on a qualitative feminist survey study to explore and analyze issues arising from the use of ARTs by women in New Delhi, the capital of India. A rapid growth in the number of fertility clinics has been noticed recently. A critical analysis of interviews revealed that these technologies are used and developed for making profits at the cost of women’s lives. In this way, these technologies are influencing and changing the traditional patterns of motherhood requiring a rethinking about new ways of reproduction introduced through the use of ARTs.

Keywords: Women, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, new ways reproduction, voluntary and involuntary choice

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110145

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1813

References:


[1] Gene Corea, The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs, New York: Harper and Row, 1985.
[2] Rothman as cited in Spilker and lie, 2007, pp. 8–9.
[3] SAMA, ARTs and Women: Assitance in Reproduction or Subjugation? New Delhi: Impulsive Creation, 2006.
[4] Anjali Widge, “Sociocultural attitudes towards infertility and assited reproduction in India”, in Effy Vayena, Patrick J. Rowe and P. David Griffin (eds.), Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction, WHO, Geneva, 2002,pp. 60-74.
[5] Janice Raymonds, Reproduction, Population, Technology and Rights, Women in Action, Vol. 2. 1998.
[6] Susan Cooper, “Paradise Lost: Sexual Function and Infertility”, Technology and Infertility, ed. by Machelle M. Seibel, Ann A. Kiessling, Judith Bernstein, Susan R. Levin, New York: Spriger, 1993, pp.303-311
[7] Germaine Greer, “The Whole Woman” UK: Anchor, 2000, p. 4.
[8] Varada Jayan Madge, “Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction”, Social Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 3, March 2012. pp.162-170.
[9] Gimenez, “The Mode of Reproduction in Transition: A Marxist- Feminist Analysis of the Effects of Reproductive Technologies”, Gender and Society, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1991, pp.334-350.
[10] S. Srinivasan, “Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Rights and Choices” Making Babies: Birth Market and Assisted Reproductive Technology in India, ed. By S. Srinivasan, New Delhi: Zubaan, 2010.
[11] J. Raymond, Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technology and the Battle over Women’s Freedom, San Francisco: Harper, 1993.
[12] Sujoy Dhar: Inter Press Service, Kolkata, June 5, 2003, http://www.aegis.com/news/ips/2003.IP030606.html.