Morphemic Analysis Awareness: A Boon or Bane on ESL Students’ Vocabulary Learning Strategy

Authors: Chandrakala Varatharajoo, Adelina Binti Asmawi, Nabeel Abdallah Mohammad Abedalaziz

Abstract:

This study investigated the impact of inflectional and derivational morphemic analysis awareness on ESL secondary school students’ vocabulary learning strategy. The quasi-experimental study was conducted with 106 low proficiency secondary school students in two experimental groups (inflectional and derivational) and one control group. The students’ vocabulary acquisition was assessed through two measures: Morphemic Analysis Test and Vocabulary- Morphemic Test in the pretest and posttest before and after an intervention programme. Results of ANCOVA revealed that both the experimental groups achieved a significant score in Morphemic Analysis Test and Vocabulary-Morphemic Test. However, the inflectional group obtained a fairly higher score than the derivational group. Thus, the results indicated that ESL low proficiency secondary school students performed better on inflectional morphemic awareness as compared to derivatives. The results also showed that the awareness of inflectional morphology contributed more on the vocabulary acquisition. Importantly, learning inflectional morphology can help ESL low proficiency secondary school students to develop both morphemic awareness and vocabulary gain. Theoretically, these findings show that not all morphemes are equally useful to students for their language development. Practically, these findings indicate that morphological instruction should at least be included in remediation and instructional efforts with struggling learners across all grade levels, allowing them to focus on meaning within the word before they attempt the text in large for better comprehension. Also, by methodologically, by conducting individualized intervention and assessment this study provided fresh empirical evidence to support the existing literature on morphemic analysis awareness and vocabulary learning strategy. Thus, a major pedagogical implication of the study is that morphemic analysis awareness strategy is a definite boon for ESL secondary school students in learning English vocabulary.

Keywords: ESL, instruction, morphemic analysis, vocabulary.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1108859

References:

[1] Donohue, R. (2000). A case and strategies for vocabulary instruction. http://buddies.org/articles/Voc1.html
[2] Caposey, T. & Heider, B. (2003). Improving reading comprehension through cooperative learning. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED478463.pdf
[3] Asgari, A & Mustapha, G. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies Used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching 4 (2).
[4] Letchumanan, K. & Tan Bee Hoon. (2011). Using Computer Games to Improve Secondary School Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition in English. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 20 (4): 1005 - 1018 (2012)
[5] Khodadoust, E., Aliasin, S.H. & Khosravi, R. (2013), The Relationship between Morphological Awareness and Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge of Iranian EFL Learners. http://soeagra.com/ijert/ijertmarch2013/10.pdf
[6] Rupley, William H., Logan, John W., & Nichols, William D. (1999). Vocabulary instruction in a balanced reading program. Reading Teacher, 52(4), p336.
[7] Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Arnold.
[8] Talerico, D.M. (2007). A Comparison of morphemic analysis and whole word meaning instruction on Sixth-Grade students’ knowledge of prefixes, taught words and transfer words. http://dscholarship. pitt.edu/9804/1/talericodmc_etdpitt2007.pdf
[9] Ebbers, S.M (2009). Vocabulary Through Morphemes: Suffixes, Prefixes, and Roots for Intermediate Grades: Research base and curriculum overview. http://readingway.com/books/vtm-research-baseand- curriculum-overview.pdf
[10] Klapper, J. (ed) (2001) Teaching Languages in Higher Education, London: CILT.
[11] Abdullah, S. A. (2004). MUET and IELTS preparation: Can one size fit both? In M.E. Vethamani (Series Ed.) & S. A. Abdullah, Preparing students for the Malaysian University English Test (MUET), 100-127. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn. Bhd.
[12] Kaur, N., & Kabilan, M.K. (2007). Autonomy in ESL: To what extent? In Ambigapathy Pandian, Koo Yew Lie & Peter Kell (Eds.) Innovation and Intervention in ELT. (pp.133-146). Serdang: UPM Press
[13] Lourdunathan, J., & Menon, S. 2005. Developing speaking skills through interaction strategy training. The English Teacher, 3: 1-18.
[14] Malek, S. (2000). Problems in speaking English among Malaysian students in Perlis. Unpublished master’s thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[15] Pillai, R. N. (2004). Using mnemonics to improve vocabulary, boost memory and enhance creativity in the ESL classroom. The English Teacher, 23: 62-83.
[16] Zakaria, Z. (2005). Dictionary as tool in vocabulary acquisition for rural students. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
[17] Ramachandran, S. D., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2004). Meaning recall and retention: the impact of the translation method on elementary level learners’ vocabulary learning. RELC Journal, 35(2): 161-178.
[18] Sharifah Sheha, S.A.B. (2005). Teaching Strategies to Counter Students” Problems in MUET-based Speaking Exam. Oracy in Focus, Ganakumaran Subramaniam & Shahizah Ismail Hamdan (Eds).
[19] Jalaluddin, N.H, Mat Awal, N. & Abu Bakar, K. (2008). The mastery of English language among lower secondary school students in Malaysia: A Linguistic analysis. European Journal of Social Sciences. 7(2).
[20] Kaweera, C. (2013). Writing error: A Review of interlingual and intralingual interference in EFL context. English Language Teaching, 6 (7). Canadian Center of Science and Education. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/viewFile/27999/168 87
[21] Chen, X., Hao, M., Geva, E., Zhu, J., & Shu, H. (2008). The role of compound awareness in Chinese children’s vocabulary acquisition and character reading. Springer Science+Business. http://psychbrain.bnu.edu.cn/teachcms/res_base/teachcms/upload/channe l/file/2010_4/12_23/pi4ugi1jput3.pdf
[22] Tatabei, O. (2011). The Relationship between Morphological Awareness and Vocabulary Size of EFL Learners. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/ index.php/elt/article/view/13382
[23] Lawrence, J.M. (2008). Differences in morphological awareness skills between children with phonological impairment and children with typical development. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=2848&context=etd
[24] Curinga, R. (2014). The effect of morphological awareness on reading comprehension: a study with adolescent Spanish-English emergent bilinguals. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2848&context=et d
[25] Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3-4), 169-190.
[26] Chang, C. M., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., W.-Y., B., & Chow, H. S. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435.
[27] Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58 (10; 238).
[28] Wang, M., Ko, I.Y., & Choi, J. (2009).The importance of morphological awareness in Korean–English biliteracy acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 34( 2), 132–142.
[29] Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics 22, 2, 217-234.
[30] Zimmerman, K. (2005). Newly placed versus continuing students: Comparing vocabulary size. ESL Reporter, 38(1), 52–60.
[31] Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[32] Carlisle, J.F (2004). Morphological processes that influence learning to read. In C.A stone, E.R. Silliman, B.J. Ehren & K.Apel (Eds.) Handbook of language and literacy. NY:Guilford Press.
[33] Bellomo, T.S. (2009). Morphological Analysis and Vocabulary Development: Critical Criteria (p. 45) http://www.readingmatrix.com/ articles/bellomo/article.pdf
[34] Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension in a foreign language: A study of young Chinese EFL learners. Science Direct System, 41,901-913.
[35] Saif, A.G.A. (2011). The importance of the processes of word-formation in the acquisition of English as a foreign language: a case study of Yemeni tertiary students of English. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/ bitstream/10603/3271/7/07_abstract.pdf
[36] Windsor, J., Scott, C.M & Street,C.K. (2000). Verb and moun morphology in the spoken and written language of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1322-1336.
[37] Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239-253.
[38] Morin, R. (2003). Derivational morphological analysis as a strategy for vocabulary acquisition in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 200-221.
[39] Long, D. & Rule, A. C. (2004). Learning vocabulary through morpheme word family object boxes. Journal of Authentic Learning, 1, 40-50
[40] Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007). Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading. Language Learning, 57, 271–298.
[41] Varatharajoo, C., Asmawi, A. & Abedalaziz, N.AM. (2014). Morphemic Analysis Awareness among ESL Low Proficiency Secondary School Students: A Strategy for Assessing VocabularyDevelopment. http://repository.um.edu.my/40392/1/FULL%20PAPER%20MELTA%2 02014.pdf
[42] Al Farsi, B. (2008). Morphological awareness and its relationship to vocabulary knowledge and morphological complexity among Omani EFL University students. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
[43] Barton, P. E. (2001) Facing the hard facts in education reform. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. http://www.ets.org/research/pic/facingfacts.pdf
[44] Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1990). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. Wheaton: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
[45] Kidd, R. & Marquardson, B. (1997). The Foresee Approach to Integrated ESL Instruction http://teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/ article/viewFile/689/520
[46] Lee, J. (2011). Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 69-92.
[47] Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). Chichester: John Willey & Sons Ltd.
[48] Rispens, J. E. McBride-Chang, C. & Reitsma, P. (2007). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Springer Science+Business MediaB.V.2007 http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/865/art%253A10.1007%252Fs1 1145-007- 90777.pdf?auth66=1423734081_aa9d7c12030b3fecc124c1bdb74889a1 &ext=.pdf
[49] van Hoogmoed, A.H., Knoors, H., Schreuder, R. & Verhoeven, L. (2012) Complex word reading in Dutch deaf children and adults. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34 (2013) 1083–1089