Performance Comparison of a Low Cost Air Quality Sensor with a Commercial Electronic Nose
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Performance Comparison of a Low Cost Air Quality Sensor with a Commercial Electronic Nose

Authors: Ünal Kızıl, Levent Genç, Sefa Aksu, Ahmet Tapınç

Abstract:

The Figaro AM-1 sensor module which employs TGS 2600 model gas sensor in air quality assessment was used. The system was coupled with a microprocessor that enables sensor module to create warning message via telephone. This low cot sensor system’s performance was compared with a DiagNose II commercial electronic nose system. Both air quality sensor and electronic nose system employ metal oxide chemical gas sensors. In the study experimental setup, data acquisition methods for electronic nose system, and performance of the low cost air quality system were evaluated and explained.

Keywords: Air quality, electronic nose, environmental quality, gas sensor.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107463

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2335

References:


[1] C. M. Wathes, M. R. Holden, R. W. Sneath, R. P. White, and V. R. Phillips “Concentrations and emission rates of aerial ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, dust and endotoxin in UK broiler and layer houses,” British Poultry Science, vol. 38, pp. 14 – 28, 1997.
[2] E. Adell, S. Calvet, A. Perez-Bonilla, A. Jimenez-Belenguer, J. Garcia, J. Herrera, and M. Cambra-Lopez “Air disinfection in laying hen houses: Effect on airborne microorganisms with focus on Mycoplasma gallisepticum,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 129, no. 2015, pp. 315 – 323, 2015.
[3] Y. Jin , T.T. Lim, J.Q. Ni, J. H. Ha, and A. J. Heber “Emissions monitoring at a deep-pit swine finishing facility: Research methods and system performance,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1264–1276, 2012.
[4] F. Di Pietrantonio, M. Benetti, D. Cannatà, E. Verona, A. Palla-Papavlu, J. M. Fernández-Pradas, P. Serra, M. Staiano, A. Varriale, and S. D’Auria “A surface acoustic wave bio-electronic nose for detection of volatile odorant molecules,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 67, no. 2015, pp. 516 – 523, 2015.
[5] J. Q. Ni, and A. J. Heber “An on-site computer system for comprehensive agricultural air quality research,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 71, no. 2010, pp. 38–49, 2010.
[6] M. Brattoli, G. de Gennaro, V. de Pinto, A. D. Loiotile, S. Lovascio, and M. Penza “Odour detection methods: olfactometry and chemical sensors,” Sensors, vol. 11, pp. 5290-5322, 2011.
[7] U. Kizil, L. Genc, T. T. Genc, S. Rahman, and M. L. Khatitsa “E-nose identification of Salmonella enterica in poultry manure,” British Poultry Science, DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2015.1014467, 2015.