An Investigation on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Concrete while Using Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as Aggregate
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
An Investigation on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Concrete while Using Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as Aggregate

Authors: Md. Jahidul Islam, A. K. M. Rakinul Islam, Md. Salamah Meherier

Abstract:

This study investigates the suitability of using plastic, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), as a partial replacement of natural coarse and fine aggregates (for example, brick chips and natural sand) to produce lightweight concrete for load bearing structural members. The plastic coarse aggregate (PCA) and plastic fine aggregate (PFA) were produced from melted polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles. Tests were conducted using three different water–cement (w/c) ratios, such as 0.42, 0.48, and 0.57, where PCA and PFA were used as 50% replacement of coarse and fine aggregate respectively. Fresh and hardened properties of concrete have been compared for natural aggregate concrete (NAC), PCA concrete (PCC) and PFA concrete (PFC). The compressive strength of concrete at 28 days varied with the water–cement ratio for both the PCC and PFC. Between PCC and PFC, PFA concrete showed the highest compressive strength (23.7 MPa) at 0.42 w/c ratio and also the lowest compressive strength (13.7 MPa) at 0.57 w/c ratio. Significant reduction in concrete density was mostly observed for PCC samples, ranging between 1977–1924 kg/m³. With the increase in water–cement ratio PCC achieved higher workability compare to both NAC and PFC. It was found that both the PCA and PFA contained concrete achieved the required compressive strength to be used for structural purpose as partial replacement of the natural aggregate; but to obtain the desired lower density as lightweight concrete the PCA is most suited.

Keywords: Polyethylene terephthalate, plastic aggregate, concrete, fresh and hardened properties.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100721

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3224

References:


[1] S. Akçaözoğlu, C. D. Atiş and K. Akçaözoğlu, “An investigation on the use of shredded waste PET bottles as aggregate in lightweight concrete”. Waste Management, vol. 30, February 2010, pp. 285 – 290.
[2] C. Albano, N. Camacho, M. Hernández, A. Matheus and A. Gutiérrez, “Influence of content and particle size of waste PET bottles on concrete behavior at different w/c ratios” Waste Management, vol. 29, October 2009, pp. 2707-2716.
[3] M. Frigione “Recycling of PET bottles as fine aggregate in concrete”, Waste Management, vol. 30, June 2010, pp. 1101-11066.
[4] O. Y. Marzouk, R. M. Dheilly and M. Queneudec, “Valorization of postconsumer waste plastic in cementitious concrete composites”, Waste Management, vol. 27, February 2007, pp. 310-3188.
[5] Y. W. Choi, D. J. Moon, Y. J. Kim and M. Lachemi, “Characteristics of mortar and concrete containing fine aggregate manufactured from recycled waste polyethylene terephthalate bottles”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, August 2009, 2829-2835.
[6] Y. W. Choi, D. J. Moon, J. S. Chung and S. K. Cho, “Effects of waste PET bottles aggregate on the properties of concrete”, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 35, April 2005, pp. 776-781.
[7] A. Ghaly and M. Gill, “Compression and deformation performance of concrete containing postconsumer plastics”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 16, July/August 2004, pp. 289-296.