Innovative Activity and Firm Performance: The Case of Eurozone Periphery
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Innovative Activity and Firm Performance: The Case of Eurozone Periphery

Authors: Ilias A. Makris

Abstract:

In this work, we attempt to analyze the contribution of innovative activities to firm performance and growth. We examine economic data from some of the economies that were heavily affected by current economic crisis: the countries of southern Europe (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain) and Ireland. Following literature, an appropriate econometric model is developed and several indicators are tested in order to disclose possible relation with innovative activity. Findings confirm the crucial effect of innovative process in economic activity, in firm and country level.

Keywords: Eurozone Periphery, Firm Performance, Innovative activity, R&D.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100274

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2161

References:


[1] D. J. Storey and B. S. Tether, “New technology-based firms in the European Union: an introduction,” Research Policy, Vol. 26, pp.933– 946, 1998.
[2] I. Hashi and N. Stojcicc, “The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4,” Research Policy, vol. 42, pp. 353– 366, 2013.
[3] M. Delapierre, B. Madeuf, and A. Savoy, “NTBFs: the French case,” Research Policy, vol. 26, pp.989–1003, 1998.
[4] M. Kafouros, “R&D and productivity growth: evidence from the UK,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp.479– 497, 2005.
[5] P. Koellinger, “The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance—Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe,” Research Policy, Vol.37, pp. 1317–1328, 2008.
[6] R. Ferguson and C. Olofsson, “Science parks and the development of NTBFs: location, survival and growth,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 29, pp.5–17, 2004.
[7] E. Autio and A. Parhankangas, “Employment generation potential of new, technology-based firms during a recessionary period: the case of Finland,” Small Business Economics, vol. 11, pp.113–123, 1988.
[8] G. Jefferson, B. Huamao, G. Xiaojing, and Y. Xiaoyun, “R&D performance in Chinese industry,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 15, No. 4–5, pp.345–366, 2006.
[9] G. Tselekidis, R. Rafailidis, I. Makris, and N. Vernardakis, “Globalization, technological flows and employment” (in Greek), Globalization and Modern Society, Special volume of National Centre for Social Research, Athens, pp.199–218, 2003.
[10] I. A. Makris, “The factors affecting firms’ growth: investment in tangible versus intangible assets in the Greek pharmaceutical industry,” International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.91–104, 2008.
[11] M. Bleaney, and K. Wakelin, “Efficiency, innovation and exports,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 64, No. 3, pp.3–15, 2002.
[12] I. Filatotchev, X. Liu, T. Buck, and M. Wright, “The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: the effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 40, No. 6, pp.1005–1021, 2009.
[13] J. P. Hahn, and M. J. Shaver, “Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 26, pp.121– 140, 2005.
[14] I. A. Makris, V. N. Nikolaidis, and S. Stavroyiannis, “Identifying factors affecting firm performance: the role of exporting activity on Greek industry,” International Journal of Business and Globalisation, vol. 9, No. 1, pp.59–69, 2012.
[15] S. Tangen, “An overview of frequently used performance measures,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 52, No. 7, pp.347–354, 2003.
[16] S. R. Chirinko, “Business fixed investment spending: modeling strategies, empirical results, and policy implications,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 31, pp.1875–1911, 1993.
[17] N. Eriotis, P. Frangouli, and Z. Ventoura-Neokosmides, (2002) “Profit margin and capital structure: an empirical relationship”, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.85–88.
[18] I. A. Makris, “What drives firm growth? Evidence from the Greek industry,” Int. J. Economics and Business Research, vol. 7, No. 1, pp.17–27, 2014.
[19] J. Wang, G. Meric, Z. Liu, and I. Meric, “Stock market crashes, firm characteristics and stock returns,” Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 33, No. 9, pp.1563–1574, 2009.
[20] I. A. Makris, V. N. Nikolaidis, and S. Stavroyiannis, “Identifying stocks’ characteristics before market crashes: the case of the Athens stock exchange,” Global Business and Economics Review, vol. 15, No. 1, pp.76–87, 2013.
[21] J. M. Sahut and J. S. Lantz, “Value creation in high-tech: the case of the telecommunication sector,” International Journal of Business, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.409–424, 2003.
[22] J. Jung, “The bigger, the better? Measuring the financial health of media firms,” The International Journal on Media Management, vol. 5, No. IV, pp.237–250, 2003.
[23] A. Ng and A. Yuce, “Risk and returns in mergers and acquisitions: efficient or agent motivations”, Journal of International Finance and Economics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 103-115, 2006.
[24] S. Lee and S. Y. Park, “Financial impacts of socially responsible activities on airline companies,” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.185–203, 2010.
[25] J. N. Variyam and D. S. Kraybill, “Empirical evidence on determinants of firm growth,” Economics Letters, vol. 38, No. 1, pp.31–36, 1992.
[26] D. S. Evans, “The relationship between firm growth, size and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.567–581, 1987.