Multidisciplinary and Multilevel Design Methodology of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Enhanced Collaborative Optimization
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Multidisciplinary and Multilevel Design Methodology of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Enhanced Collaborative Optimization

Authors: Pedro F. Albuquerque, Pedro V. Gamboa, Miguel A. Silvestre

Abstract:

The present work describes the implementation of the Enhanced Collaborative Optimization (ECO) multilevel architecture with a gradient-based optimization algorithm with the aim of performing a multidisciplinary design optimization of a generic unmanned aerial vehicle with morphing technologies. The concepts of weighting coefficient and dynamic compatibility parameter are presented for the ECO architecture. A routine that calculates the aircraft performance for the user defined mission profile and vehicle’s performance requirements has been implemented using low fidelity models for the aerodynamics, stability, propulsion, weight, balance and flight performance. A benchmarking case study for evaluating the advantage of using a variable span wing within the optimization methodology developed is presented.

Keywords: Multidisciplinary, Multilevel, Morphing, Enhanced Collaborative Optimization (ECO).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100218

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2444

References:


[1] D. P. Raymer, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. AIAA, 1989.
[2] R. T. Haftka, J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, and S. L. Padula, “On Options for Interdisciplinary Analysis and Design Optimization,” Structural Optimization, vol. 4, p. 6574, 1992.
[3] E. J. Cramer, J. E. Dennis Jr., P. D. Frank, and a. S. G. R. Lewis, R. M., “Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 754776, 1994.
[4] R. J. Balling and J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, “Optimization of Coupled Systems: A Critical Overview of Approaches,” AIAA Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, p. pp. 617, 1996.
[5] N. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini, “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State-of-the-Art,” SIAM, 1997.
[6] I. M. Kroo, “”MDO for Large-Scale Design Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State-of-the-Art,” edited by N. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini SIAM, p. pp. 2244, 1997.
[7] N. M. Alexandrov, “Multilevel Methods for MDO,” Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State-of-the-Art, edited by N. M. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini SIAM, 1997.
[8] R. J. Balling Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State-of-the-Art, edited by N. M. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini, SIAM, no. 1.
[9] S. J. Sobieszczanski and R. T. Haftka, “Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization: Survey of Recent Developments,” Structural Optimization, vol. 14, no. 1, p. pp. 123, 1997.
[10] J. R. R. A. Martins and A. B. Lambe, “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: A Survey of Architectures,” AIAA Journal, vol. 51, pp. 2049–2075, 2013.
[11] Weisshaar, Terrence A., “Morphing Aircraft Technology New Shapes for Aircraft Design,” 2006.
[12] S. Barbarino, O. Bilgen, R. Ajaj, M. Friswell, and D. Inman, “A Review of Morphing Aircraft,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 22, pp. pp. 823–877, 2011.
[13] S. Joshi, Z. Tidwell, W. Crossley, and S. Ramakrishnan, “Comparison of Morphing Wing Strategies Based Upon Aircraft Performance Impacts,” 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2004.
[14] P. F. Albuquerque, P. V. Gamboa, and M. A. Silvestre, “Parametric Aircraft Design Optimisation Study Using Span and Mean Chord as Main Design Drivers,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 1016, pp. 365–369, 2014.
[15] B. Roth and I. Kroo, “Enhanced Collaborative Optimization: Application to an Analytic Test Problem and Aircraft Design,” 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2008.
[16] B. Roth and I. Kroo, “Enhanced Collaborative Optimization: A Decomposition-Based Method for Multidisciplinary Design,” ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2008, 2008.
[17] B. D. Roth, “Aircraft Family Design Using Enhanced Collaborative Optimization,” Master’s thesis, Stanford University, 2008.
[18] I. M. Kroo, S. Altus, R. Braun, P. Gage, and I. Sobieski, “Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design,” 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1994.
[19] S. Kodiyalam, “Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Phase I,” Tech. Rep. CR-1998-208716, NASA, 1998.
[20] S. Kodiyalam and C. Yuan, “Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part 2,” Tech. Rep. CR-2000-210313, NASA, 2000.
[21] A. J. de Wit and F. van Keulen, “Numerical Comparison of Multi-level Optimization Techniques,” AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, 2007.
[22] S. I. Yi, J. K. Shin, and G. J. Park, “Comparison of MDO Methods with Mathematical Examples,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 39, p. 391402, 2008.
[23] X. Mi, Q. Haobo, G. Liang, S. Xinyu, and C. Xuezheng, “An Enhanced Collaborative Optimization Methodology for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization,” The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, P.R.China, 2010.
[24] P. Spellucci, “A SQP method for general nonlinear programs using only equality constrained subproblems,” Math. Prog., vol. 82, pp. 413–448, 1998.
[25] P. Spellucci, “A new technique for inconsistent problems in the SQP method. Math. Meth. of Oper. Res,” Math. Meth. of Oper. Res., vol. 47, pp. 355–400, 1998.
[26] J. R. C. Mestrinho, P. V. Gamboa, and P. D. Santos, “Design Optimization of a Variable-Span Morphing Wing for a Small UAV,” 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials (and co-located) Conferences, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2011.
[27] J. Fel´ıcio, P. D. Santos, P. V. Gamboa, and M. A. R. Silvestre, “Evaluation of a Variable-Span Morphing Wing for a Small UAV,” 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials (and co-located) Conferences, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2011.
[28] R. Cunha, “Structural Analysis of a Variable-span Wing-box,” Master’s thesis, University of Beira Interior, 2014.
[29] P. V. Gamboa, M. A. Silvestre, and P. F. Albuquerque, “Aircraft Design Methodology Using Span and Mean Wing Chord as Main Design Parameters,” International Conference in Engineering of University of Beira Interior, Covilh˜a, Portugal, 2013.
[30] J. Morgado, M. A. Silvestre, and J. C. P´ascoa, “Validation of New Formulations for Propeller Analysis,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014.
[31] B. Etkin, Dynamics of Flight - Stability and Control. John Wukey Cons, Inc, 1996.