The Anthropological Determination of Pedagogy
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
The Anthropological Determination of Pedagogy

Authors: Sara Kakuk

Abstract:

Pedagogy has always been open to other disciplines that reflect about the educational process (philosophy, sociology, psychology, anthropology, technology, etc.). Its interdisciplinary openness puts education, as the subject of pedagogy within a broader context of the community, enabling the knowledge of other disciplines to contribute to a better understanding of the fundamental pedagogical notion of education. The purpose of pedagogy as a science serves humans, strives towards humans, must be for humans, and this is its ultimate goal. Humans are essentially dependent on education, which is also considered as a category of humans’ being, because through education an entire world develops in humans. Anthropological assumptions of humans as "deficient beings" see the solution in education, but they also indicate a wealth of shortcomings, because they provide an opportunity for enrichment and formation of culture, living and the self. In that context, this paper illustrates the determination of pedagogy through an anthropological conception of humans and the phenomenon of education. It presents a review of anthropological ideas about education, by providing an analysis of relevant literature dealing with the anthropological notion of humans, which provides fruitful conditions for a pedagogical reconsideration of education.

Keywords: Pedagogy, education, humans, anthropology, culture.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100064

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2625

References:


[1] A. Vukasović, Pedagogy. Zagreb: WE, 1990.
[2] Ž. Bezić, Be a human, but how?, Đakovo: UPT, 1996.
[3] H. Roth, Pedagogische Antrephologie. Hannover: Hermann Schroedel Verlag KG, 1966.
[4] S. Bašić, "Education", in A. Mijatović, Basics of modern pedagogy, Zagreb, Teaching-Literary Society, 1990, pp. 175-203.
[5] W. Brezinka, "Die Pädagogik der NeuenLinken. Analyse und Kritik", Stuttgart: Seewald, 1973, pp 95.
[6] W. Dilthey, "Paedagogik: Geschichte und Grundliniendes Systems". Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft; Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1961.
[7] J. Lenzen, "Guide to the study of educational science". Zagreb: EDUCA, 2002.
[8] H. Giesecke, "Introduction to Pedagogy". Zagreb: Educa, 1993.
[9] A. P. Ogurcov, "Pedagogical anthropology - Search and Perspectives". Pedagogy, No 2, 2005, pp. 147-181.
[10] M. Mušanović, M. Lukaš, "Basics of Pedagogy". Zagreb: Croatian Futurological Association, 2011.
[11] H. Gudjons, "Pedagogy – basics knowledge". Zagreb: Educa, 1994
[12] A. Gehlen, "Human - His nature and his position in the world", Zagreb: Copies Birch, 2005, pp 33.
[13] V. Vujčić, "General Pedagogy". Zagreb: Croatian Pedagogic-Literary Association, 2013.
[14] A. Gehlen, "Human and Institutions". Zagreb: Publisher Globus, 1994.
[15] F. Krautzer, “The instinct”. Life. Vol 8, No 15, 1934, pp. 363.
[16] Ž. Senković, “Antropological determination of education”. Life and school, No 17, 2007, pp. 62-69.
[17] G. Haeffner, “Phylosophical Antropology”. Publisher Birch, 2003.
[18] I. Kant, “The legal and political writings”. Zagreb: Political culture, 2003.
[19] J. J. Rousseau, “Emil or about education”, Beograd: Estetika, 1989 - 1990.
[20] E. Hufnagel, “Philosophy pedagogy”. Zagreb: Demetra, 2002.
[21] M. Scheller, “Man's position in the cosmos”. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša, 1960.
[22] M. Scheller, “The idea of man and anthropology”. Zagreb: Publisher Globus, 1996, pp. 197.
[23] W. Glasser, “Quality School”. Zagreb: EDUCA, 2005.
[24] H. Plessner, “Condiciohumana: Philosophical discussions about anthropology”, Zagreb: Publisher Globus, 1994.
[25] Z. Pregrad, “Aesthetic Culture and Aesthetic Education”. Progress, Vol 82, No (1-2), 1945, pp.11-23.
[26] P. Vuk-Pavlović, “Philosophy of Education”. Zagreb: Croatian University Publishers, pp 65.
[27] M. Polić, "Man and Culture". Philosophical research, No 28, Vol 1, 2008, pp.3-11.
[28] M. Polić, "Education and Creativity", Metodical tour, Zagreb, No 9, Vol 2 (16), 2002, pp.9-17
[29] M. Palekčić, "Pedagogical tact - the basic concept of pedagogy". In: The teacher as a factor in the quality of teaching. (Proceedings - Science colloquium with international peer review). Rijeka: Faculty of Philosophy, 1999, pp. 116-125.
[30] C.A. Ellwood, "Lombroso's Theory of Crime". Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, No 5, Vol 2, 1912, pp. 716-723.
[31] R.M. Lerner, "Concepts and Theories of Human Development". London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2002.
[32] E. Kretschmer, "Physique and Character". London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubingen & Co, LTD, 1925.
[33] J. Kuničić, "Christian Pedagogy". Zagreb: KS, 1970. pp. 28.
[34] B. Bettelheim, "Feral Children and Autistic Children". U: The American Journal of Sociology, 64 (5), 91, 1959.
[35] V. Filipović (ed.), " Philosophical Dictionary, Zagreb: Matic Croatia, 1965, pp. 284.
[36] Ž. Bezić, "Is it worth to educate?" Renewed Life, No 6, Vol 30, 1975, pp. 557
[37] H. Hobmair, et al., "Pädagogik", München: Stam, 1993.