Public Policy and Sexuality Education for Youth with Disabilities: Impact on Sexual Behavior and Outcomes
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Public Policy and Sexuality Education for Youth with Disabilities: Impact on Sexual Behavior and Outcomes

Authors: Alexandra M. Kriofske Mainella

Abstract:

This paper will examine the need for more aggressive public policies around bodily, reproductive and sexual health education for young people with disabilities in the United States. This paper will consider the policies around sexuality education for students in the United States and the recommendation for national standards around sexuality education. We will investigate the intersection of these policies and recommendations for students with disabilities and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): what this means for students with disabilities’ access to comprehensive sexuality education and how it affects their behaviors and outcomes.

Keywords: Disability, sexuality, education, policy.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099090

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2202

References:


[1] Guttmacher Institute. 2013. “State Policies in Brief,” http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_se.pdf
[2] United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2012. “UNECE Statistical Database and United Nations Demographics Yearbook” 2009- 2010.
[3] SEICUS. 2011. “Mississippi State Profile,” http://www.seicus.org
[4] SEICUS. 2011. “New Mexico State Profile,” http://www.seicus.org
[5] SEICUS. 2011. “Arkansas State Profile,” http://www.seicus.org
[6] SEICUS. 2011. “Texas State Profile,” http://www.seicus.org
[7] SEICUS. 2011. “Minnesota State Profile,” http://www.seicus.org
[8] Gallup, Religiosity 2011. (Data File). New York, NY: Gallup Organization (Producer). Storrs, CT: Roper Center (Distributor).
[9] Almazan, A. Esq. 2009. “Inclusive Education and Implications for Policy: The state of the Art and the Promise. TASH Congressional Briefing on Inclusive Education”, July 2009.
[10] United Cerebral Palsy. 2013. The case for inclusion, http://www.ucp.org/the-case-for-inclusion/2013
[11] Braithwaite, J,and Mont, D. 2008. “Disability and Poverty: A Survey of World Bank Poverty Assessments and Implications,” The World Bank: Social Protection and Labor, February 2008.
[12] Future of Sex Education Initiative. 2012. “National Sexuality Education Standards: Core Content and Skills, K-12,” A special publication of the Journal of School Health.
[13] Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 670, 20, USC 1470. 2004.
[14] Jones, K. H., Woolcock-Henry, C.O., andDomenico, D. M. 2005. “Wake Up Call: Pregnant and Parenting Teens with Disabilities,” International Journal of Special Education, 20-1: 92-104.
[15] Ailey, S.H., Marks, B.A, Crisp, C. and Hahn, J.E.2003. “Promoting Sexuality across the Life Span for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,”Nursing Clinics of North America, June, 38(2):229-52.
[16] Indiana University. 2012. “Teenage Pregnancy and Youth with Intellectual Disabilities,”Indiana Secondary Resource Center, (Fact Sheets).
[17] Suris, J. 1996. “Sexual Behavior of Adolescents with Chronic Illness and Disabilities,” Journal of Adolescent Health. 19, 124-136.
[18] Baladerian N., Coleman and Stream. 2012. “Abuse of People with Disabilities: Victims and their Families Speak out,”AReport on the 2012 National Survey of Abuse of People with Disabilities.
[19] Smith, N. and Harrell, S. 2013.“Sexual Abuse of Children with Disabilities: A National Snapshot,”Vera Institute of Justice,Issue Brief March 2013.
[20] Lund, E.M. and Vaughn-Jensen, J. 2012. “Victimisation of Children with Disabilities,” The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9845, 867-869.