Developing New Academics: So What Difference Does It Make?

Authors: N. Chitanand

Abstract:

Given the dynamic nature of the higher education landscape, induction programmes for new academics has become the norm nowadays to support academics negotiate these rough terrain. This study investigates an induction programme for new academics in a higher education institution to establish what difference it has made to participants. The findings revealed that the benefits ranged from creating safe spaces for collaboration and networking to fostering reflective practice and contributing to the scholarship of teaching and learning. The study also revealed that some of the intentions of the programme may not have been achieved, for example transformative learning. This led to questioning whether this intention is an appropriate one given the short duration of the programme and the long, drawn out process of transformation. It may be concluded that the academic induction programme in this study serves to sow the seeds for transformative learning through fostering critically reflective practice. Recommendations for further study could include long term impact of the programme on student learning and success, these being the core business of higher education. It is also recommended that in addition to an induction programme, the university invests in a mentoring programme for new staff and extend the support for academics in order to sustain critical reflection and which may contribute to transformative educational practice.

Keywords: Induction programme, reflective practice, scholarship of teaching, transformative learning.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1098976

References:

[1] L. Quinn. Introduction. In Quinn (Eds), Re-imagining academic staff development: spaces for disruption. Stellenbosch: Sun Media, 2012. pp. 1-14.
[2] R. Barnett. Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher education, vol 34, no. 4, pp 429-440. 2009.
[3] H. K. Wong. Induction Programs That Keep New Teachers Teaching and Improving. NASSP Bulletin, vol88 (638): 41-57. 2004.
[4] P. Boyd. Academic induction for professional educators: supporting the workplace learning of newly appointed lecturers in teacher and nurse education, International Journal for Academic Development, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155-165, 2010.
[5] E. Huber, S. Hoadley & L. Wood. Teaching induction programmes: Framework, design and delivery. Asian Social Science. vol.7, no. 11, pp 13-19, Nov. 2011.
[6] R. Lazovsky & R. Reichenberg. The new mandatory induction programme for all beginning teachers in Israel: perceptions of inductees in five study tracks, Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 53-70, 2006.
[7] K. Martinez. Academic induction for teacher educators, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 35-51, 2008.
[8] S. Mathieson. Developing academic agency through critical reflection: a sociocultural approach to academic induction programmes, International Journal for Academic Development, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 243-256, 2011.
[9] C. Ndebele. Staff perceptions on an academic staff induction programme at a South African University: Lessons for educational development. Journal of Social Sciences. Vol 36. No. 2. 103-111. 2013.
[10] N. Wadesango & S. Machingambi. What’s the use of induction courses? A case study of three South African Universities. Journal of Social Sciences, vol.26, no. 1, 1-9. 2011.
[11] E. Britton, L. Paine, D. Pimm S. & Raizen, S. (Eds).Comprehensive teacher induction: systems for early career learning. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers and West Ed. 2003.
[12] S. Southwood. Spaces of development: A dialogical re-imagination, In Quinn (Eds), Re-imagining academic staff development: spaces for disruption. Stellenbosch: Sun Media, 2012.
[13] C. Ellis. Evocative autoethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice. Albany, NY: State University of New York, 115-139. 1997.
[14] Johnson and Geal. Trainer Development: understanding reflective practice. Training Journal. January, pp.40-43. 2005.
[15] J. Whitehead. Using a living theory methodology in improving practice and generating educational knowledge in living theories. Educational Journal of Living Theories. (online),vol.1, no.1 pp. 103-126. Available http://www.ejolts.net/node/80 (Accessed 14 January 2010). 2009.
[16] J. Mezirow. Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In Mezirow, J (ed.) Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. California: Jossey-Bass Inc., 3-34. 2000.
[17] E.V. O’Sullivan, A. Morrell & M.A. O’Connor, M. A. (Eds.) Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning: Essays on theory and praxis. New York, NY: Palgrave. 2002.
[18] P. C. Taylor. Research as transformative learning for meaning-centred professional development. In O. Kovbasyuk & P. Blessinger (eds.) Meaning-centred education: International perspectives and explorations in higher education. Routledge Publishing. 2013.
[19] S.D. Brookfield. Transformative learning as ideology critique. In Mezirow, J (ed.) Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. California: Jossey-Bass Inc., 103-124. 2000.
[20] D.A. Schon. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. 1983.
[21] E.W. Taylor. Fostering Mezirow’s transformative learning theory in the adult education classroom: A critical review. The Canadian Journal for the study of Adult Education. 14(2): 1-28. 2000.
[22] L. Richardson. Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.516-529).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1994.
[23] D.A. Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1994.
[24] O. Zuber-Skerrit, & Y. Ryan (Eds.). Quality in Post Graduate Research. London: Kogan Page. 1994.
[25] J. Whitehead. Action Research and Living Theories Methodologies. Self-Study for transformative higher education and social action (SeStuTHESA) Workshop: 28th October 2010. Durban University of Technology. 2010.
[26] N.K. Denzin& Y.S. Lincoln. Introduction, In N.K. Denzin& Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative research, 2nded,,Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2000, pp. 1-29.
[27] C.K. Riessman. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2008.
[28] P. Palmer. The heart of a teacher: Identity and integrity in teaching. San Francisco: Joey-Bass Publishers. 1998.
[29] J. Lave and E. Wenger.Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991.
[30] L.S. Shulman. From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, 2000.
[31] D. Brijlall. Exploring the Gurteen Knowledge Café approach as an innovative teaching for learning strategy with first-year Engineering students. To appear: Groupwork. 2014.
[32] N. Chitanand. Sowing the seeds for transformative educational practice, InB. Pierce and G. Stewart (Eds), Transformation. Looking back in history and forward to change. Durban University of Technology: faculty of arts and Design. 2013. pp. 62-73.
[33] S. McKenna. Interrogating the academic project. . In Quinn (Eds), Reimagining academic staff development: spaces for disruption. Stellenbosch: Sun Media, 2012.