The Effects of Gender and Socioeconomic Status on Academic Motivation: The Case of Lithuania

Authors: Ausra Turcinskaite-Balciuniene, Jonas Balciunas, Gediminas Merkys

Abstract:

The problematic of gender and socioeconomic status biased differences in academic motivation patterns is discussed. Gender identity is understood according to symbolic interactionism perspective: as a result of reflected appraisals, social comparisons, self-attributions, and identifications, shaped by social environment and family context. The effects of socioeconomic status on academic motivation are conceptualized according to Bourdieu’s habitus concept, reflecting the role of unconscious and internalized cultural signals, proper to low and high socioeconomic status family contexts. Since families differ by various socioeconomic features, the hypothesis about possible impact of parents’ socioeconomic status on their children’s academic motivation interfering with gender socialization effects is held. The survey, aiming to seize gender differences in academic motivation and self-recorded improvementoriented efforts as a result of socialization processes operating in the families of low and high socioeconomic status, was designed. The results of Lithuanian higher education students’ survey are presented and discussed.

Keywords: Academic Motivation, Gender, Socialization, Socioeconomic Status.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338008

References:

[1] D. L. Best, “The Contributions of the Whitings to the Study of the Socialization of Gender”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 41 (4), pp. 534–545, Jul. 2010.
[2] P. Bourdieu, and J. Passeron, (1985). “Les heritiers, les etudiants et la culture”. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1985.
[3] B. G. Brinkman, K. L. Rabenstein, L. A. Rosen, and T. S. Zimmerman, “Children’s Gender Identity Development: The Dynamic Negotiation Process Between Conformity and Authenticity”. Youth and Society, Sage, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2012.
[4] A. Turcinskaite-Balciuniene and G. Merkys, “Gender Differences in Studies’ Motivational Attitudes: The Context of Lithuanian Students’ Socialization (Accepted for publication)”. Social Research, to be published.
[5] J. Eccles, “Gendered Educational and Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices”. International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 35 (3), pp. 195–201, May, 2011.
[6] J. Boiche, M. Plaza, A. Chalabaev, E. Guillet-Descas, and P. Sarrazin, “Social Antecedents and Consequences of Gender-Sport Stereotypes During Adolescence”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, Sage, pp. 1–16, Oct. 2013.
[7] R. Chuinard and N. Roy, (2008). „Changes in High-School Students’Competence Beliefs, Utility Value and Achievement Goals in Mathematics”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 78, pp. 31–50, 2008.
[8] S. K. Buday, J. E. Stake, and Z. D. Peterson, (2012). “Gender and the Choice of a Science Carrier: The Impact of Social Support and Possible Selves”. Sex Roles, vol. 66, pp. 197–209, 2012.
[9] C. Spera, “Adolescents’ Perceptions of Parental Goals, Practices, and Styles in Relation to Their Motivation and Achievement”. The Journal of Early Adolescence, vol. 26 (4), pp. 456–490, Oct. 2006.
[10] V. Gecas, “Socialization”. In Borgatta, E. & Montgomery, R. (Eds.), Gale Encyclopedia of Sociology. 2d Ed., New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2000, pp. 2855–2864.
[11] D. L. Carlson and C. Knoester, “Family Structure and the Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Ideology”. Journal of Family Issues, vol. 32 (6), pp. 709–734, Apr. 2011.
[12] A. Hadjar, D. Baier, and K. Boehnke, “The Socialization of Hierarchic Self-Interest: Value Socialization in the Family”. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research, vol. 16 (3), pp. 279–301, Sep. 2008.
[13] S. H. Schwartz and T. Rubel-Lifschitz, “Cross-National Variation in the Size of Sex Differences in Values: Effects of Gender Equality”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 97 (1), pp. 171–185, 2009.
[14] S. Hicks, “Gender Role Models… Who Needs ‘Em?!” Qualitative Social Work, vol. 7(1), pp. 43–59. 2008.
[15] F. M. Deutsch, „Undoing Gender“. Gender and Society, vol. 21, pp. 106–127, Jan. 2007.
[16] E. Portfeli, L. Ferrari and L. Nota, “Work Valence as a Predictor of Academic Achievement in the Family Context”. Journal of Career Development, vol. 40 (5), pp. 371–389, October 2012.
[17] H. Raty and K. Kasanen, “Gendered Views of Ability in Parents’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Academic Competencies”. Sex Roles, vol. 56, pp. 117–124, Jan. 2007.
[18] L. Swalander and K. Taube, “Influences on Family Based Prerequisites, Reading Attitude, and Self-Regulation on Reading Ability”. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 206–230, Mar. 2006.
[19] J. L. Meece, B. B. Glienke, and S. Burg, “Gender and Motivation”. Journal of School Psychology, vol. 44, pp. 351–373, 2006.
[20] M. Sanchez-Lopez, I. Cuellar-Flores, R. Liminana and J. Corbalan, “Differential Personality Styles in Men and Women: The Modulating Effect of Gender Conformity”. SAGE Open, pp. 1–14, Apr.-Jun. 2012.
[21] J. A. Molina, J. I. Gimenez-Nadal, J. A. Cuesta, C. Gracia-Lazaro, Y. Moreno, and A. Sanchez, “Gender Differences in Cooperation: Experimental Evidence on High School Students”. PLOS ONE, vol. 8 (12), pp. 1–10, 2013.
[22] H. Marrs and E. A. Sigler, “Male Academic Performance in College: The Possible Role of Study Strategies”. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, vol. 13 (2), pp. 227–241, 2011.
[23] A. M. O’Rand, “Social Inequality”. In Borgatta, E. & Montgomery, R. (Eds.), Gale Encyclopedia of Sociology. 2d Ed., New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2000, pp. 2690–2695.
[24] P. Blau and O. Duncan, “The American Occupational Structure”. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1967.
[25] E. Lee and R. Kramer, “Out with the Old, In with the New? Habitus and Social Mobility at Selective Colleges”. Sociology of Education, vol. 86, pp. 18–35, May 2012.
[26] I. L. Mokrova, M. O’Brien, S. D. Calkins, E. M. Leerkes, and S. Marcovitch, “Links between Family Social Status and Preschoolers’ Persistence: The Role of Maternal Values and Quality of Parenting”. Infant and Child Development, vol. 21, pp. 617–633, Jun. 2012.
[27] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000”. Paris: OECD, 2001.
[28] S. Boone and M. Van Houtte, “In Search of the Mechanisms Conducive to Class Differentials in Educational Choice: A Mixed Method Research”. Sociological Review, vol. 61(3), pp. 549–572, Aug. 2013.
[29] T. Greenhalgh, K. Seyan, and P. Boynton, “‘Not a University Type’: Focus Group Study of Social Class, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in School Pupils’ Perceptions about Medical School”. British Medical Journal, vol. 328(7455), pp. 1541–1544, Jul. 2004.
[30] C. Ming, “Families, Economies, Cultures, and Science Achievement in 41 Countries: Country-. School-, and Student-Level Analyses”. Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 21(3), pp. 510–519, Sep. 2007.
[31] J. Smith and R. Naylor, “Determinants of Degree Performance in UK Universities: a Statistical Analysis of the 1993 Student Cohort,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 63, pp. 29–60, Jan. 2001.
[32] E. B. Reeves, “The Effects of Opportunity to Learn, Family Socioeconomic Status, and Friends on the Rural Math Achievement Gap in High School”. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 56(7), pp. 887– 907, Jul. 2012.
[33] E. W. Morris, “Social Class, Masculinity, and Schooling in a Rural Context”. Gender and Society, vol. 22(6), pp. 728–751, Dec. 2008
[34] T. Bargel, M. Schmidt, and H. Bargel, “Quality and equity in higher education – international experiences and comparisons. International Workshop November 2008”. Konstanz: Konstanz University, 2009.
[35] G. Merkys, R. Lekaviciene, D. Saparniene, I. Mikutaviciene, and A. Turcinskaite-Andujar, (2009). “Akademiniu studiju kokybe ir socialinis kontekstas. Lietuvos studentu tarpkulturinis palyginamasis tyrimas (report)”. Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology, 2009.
[36] A. Turcinskaite-Balciuniene and G. Merkys, “Assessing Higher Education Quality in the Context of Conceptual Confusion and Methodological Eclecticism”. Social Research, vol. 21 (4), pp. 70–81, Dec. 2010.
[37] Z. Pauliukaite, A. Turcinskaite-Balciuniene, and J. Balciunas, „Translation Quality of Survey Instruments: Assessment of Questionnaire on Motivation and Academic Studies Quality”. Social Research, vol. 22 (1), pp. 52–64, Feb. 2011.
[38] Z. Pauliukaite, A. Turcinskaite-Balciuniene, and G. Merkys, “Cross- Cultural Validation of QUISS II Questionnaire: The Case of Lithuania”. 4th International Conference: Changes in Social and Business Environment, issue: 4, pp. 155–164, Nov. 2011 (on www.ceeol.com).
[39] D. DeVaus, ”Surveys in Social Research”. Routledge, 2004.
[40] C. DiStefano, M. Zhu, and D. Mindrila, “Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher”. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 14 (20), 1–11, Oct. 2009.